2001
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.50.9.2069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of Impaired Glucose Transport and Phosphorylation in Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance

Abstract: It has been postulated that glucose transport is the principal site of skeletal muscle insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes, though a distribution of control between glucose transport and phosphorylation has also been proposed. The current study examined whether the respective contributions of transport and phosphorylation to insulin resistance are modulated across a dose range of insulin stimulation. Rate constants for transport and phosphorylation in skeletal muscle were estimated using dynamic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Williams et al showed that glucose transport increased in response to insulin in lean and obese patients but not significantly in type 2 diabetic subjects. A dose-responsive pattern of glucose phosphorylation stimulation was observed in all groups but was lower in obese and type 2 diabetic patients (22). Weight loss (23), exercise training (24,25), rosiglitazone (26), and troglitazone (27) have all been shown to improve skeletal muscular 18 F-FDG uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Williams et al showed that glucose transport increased in response to insulin in lean and obese patients but not significantly in type 2 diabetic subjects. A dose-responsive pattern of glucose phosphorylation stimulation was observed in all groups but was lower in obese and type 2 diabetic patients (22). Weight loss (23), exercise training (24,25), rosiglitazone (26), and troglitazone (27) have all been shown to improve skeletal muscular 18 F-FDG uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rather, the model indicates a lower cellular uptake and/or decreased phosphorylation rate of glucose, as indicated by the lower phosphorylation fraction in the fasted condition. As stated above, it should be noted that glucose transport into BAT reflects movement of [ 18 F]FDG to both intracellular and interstitial space [33] and that two-tissue compartment modelling does not completely discriminate between (GLUTmediated) glucose transport into brown adipocytes and/or subsequent phosphorylation by hexokinase. We are therefore not able to distinguish between brown adipocyte [ 18 F]FDG uptake or [ 18 F]FDG phosphorylation as the main determinant of decreased BAT [ 18 F]FDG uptake upon fasting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin resistance can be associated with deficits in muscle blood flow (Clerk et al, 2007;Duplain et al, 2001;Inyard et al, 2009;Laakso et al, 1992), membrane glucose transport (Han et al, 1995;Liu et al, 1996;Zierath et al, 1997) and intracellular capacity to phosphorylate glucose (Bonadonna et al, 1996;Braithwaite et al, 1995;Pendergrass et al, 1998;Williams et al, 2001). We delineated the steps that cause the functional impairment in muscle glucose uptake by applying the countertransport method to rats fed a high-fat diet.…”
Section: Control Of Insulin-stimulated Muscle Glucose Influxmentioning
confidence: 99%