10th AIAA/ASME Joint Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-4888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of Single-Nozzle Sonic Propulsive Deceleration Jets on Mars Entry Aeroshells

Abstract: Due to scientific interest in increasing the mass of Mars entry systems and the altitude of their landing sites, the size requirements for the conventional aerodynamic decelerators used to slow the vehicle from hypersonic velocities in the upper atmosphere to zero velocity on the surface may become unfeasible. One option is propulsive decelerator (PD) jets which may be used to slow the vehicle down to appropriate speeds. The use of these PD jets, however, involve complex flow interactions that are still not we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated coefficient of drag (C D ) and total axial force (sum of C D and C T ) for the sonic peripheral 4-jet configuration and sonic single centerline (Central) jet configuration are shown in Figure 14. As shown in this figure, C D decreases when the peripheral jets are turned on for C T = 0.5 and 1.5; however, the decrease is considerably less than the previous reported [18] single centerline jet case also shown in this figure. The total axial force in the 4-jet peripheral case increases, even for C T = 0.5, unlike the single centerline (Central) sonic case, which can be seen to decrease for low C T .…”
Section: B Numerical Simulation Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calculated coefficient of drag (C D ) and total axial force (sum of C D and C T ) for the sonic peripheral 4-jet configuration and sonic single centerline (Central) jet configuration are shown in Figure 14. As shown in this figure, C D decreases when the peripheral jets are turned on for C T = 0.5 and 1.5; however, the decrease is considerably less than the previous reported [18] single centerline jet case also shown in this figure. The total axial force in the 4-jet peripheral case increases, even for C T = 0.5, unlike the single centerline (Central) sonic case, which can be seen to decrease for low C T .…”
Section: B Numerical Simulation Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Experimental results will be compared with numerical simulations from the University of Michigan. Numerical simulations are executed using LeMANS, a parallelized CFD code developed at the University of Michigan for simulating hypersonic reacting flows [15][16][17][18]. LeMANS solves the laminar three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured computational grids, including thermo-chemical nonequilibrium effects.…”
Section: Cfd (University Of Michigan)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shielding creates a low-pressure region between the jet boundary and the aeroshell, resulting in reduced aerodynamic drag force with increasing thrust coefficient [22]. References [22] and [23] show that the LeMANS calculations agree very well with the measured fluorescence images, both with respect to the streamline shapes and the shock standoff distance. These very good comparisons provide confidence that LeMANS is accurately capturing the details of the flowfield and can be used to calculate values, such as the drag coefficient C D , that cannot be measured in the experiment.…”
Section: A Central Pd Jetmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Figure 1 shows a full hypersonic flowfield computed around a capsule taken from Ref. 6. The insert shows the post-shock, high-enthalpy, subsonic region considered in the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%