2022
DOI: 10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Dimensionality Reduction for Comparative Analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How to plug visual analysis tool into experts' development environment. ULCA [21] and PipelineProfiler [57] targeting simple models and datasets are integrated with Jupyter Notebook, and a few other works focusing on deep models, such as ex-plAIner [71], are TensorBoard [1] plug-ins. The target users of our work are experts developing QA models, who generally use Python and are familiar with TensorBoard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How to plug visual analysis tool into experts' development environment. ULCA [21] and PipelineProfiler [57] targeting simple models and datasets are integrated with Jupyter Notebook, and a few other works focusing on deep models, such as ex-plAIner [71], are TensorBoard [1] plug-ins. The target users of our work are experts developing QA models, who generally use Python and are familiar with TensorBoard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding Analysis. The combination of Dimension Reduction (DR) algorithms and visualization is a common method to analyze embeddings [21] and offering interpretability [22]. In the NLP context, researchers usually use PCA [27], t-SNE [79], UMAP [52], and other DR methods to reduce the high-dimensional word embeddings of each layer to 2D and visualize them in the form of scatter plots to understand the semantic information learned by the model through the change in distance between words.…”
Section: Interpretability Analysis Methods For Transformersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others learn new distance functions for MDS to update the projection to best respect user manipulations [8,42]. Fujiwara et al provide a visual analytics framework for comparative analysis, providing interactions to manipulate and update projections to illustrate the similarities and differences between clusters of points [22]. This work expands on past work by specifically targeting imaged data to provide both projection-steering interactions and visual explanations of the 2D space.…”
Section: Semantic Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find similarities and differences between groups of a dataset, Fujiwara et al [15] describe a technique to interactively adjust embeddings by moving or scaling group representations and showing the impact of attributes on the embeddings' axes, carrying on from previous work on interactive embeddings [16], [17]. Ma and Maciejewski [18] describe the analysis of class separations in embeddings through locally linear segments, which connects the work to other recent efforts to explain non-linear embeddings [19], [20], [21].…”
Section: Exploration Of Embedding Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%