2017
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201720150629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of genotype x environment on the live weight of GIFT Nile tilapias

Abstract: In this paper, the existence of a genotype x environment interaction for the average daily weight in GIFT Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in different regions in the state of Paraná (Brazil) was analyzed. The heritability results were high in the uni-characteristic analysis: 0.71, 0.72 and 0.67 for the cities of Palotina (PL), Floriano (FL) and Diamond North (DN), respectively. Genetic correlations estimated in bivariate analyzes were weak with values between 0.12 for PL-FL, 0.06 for PL and 0.23 for DN-FL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Brazil is a continental country with many options for fish production systems, it is important to evaluate Genotype × Environment to gain insight on better performance in tilapia production since phenotype is a consequence of genotype under the influence of environment (Ponzoni et al, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2017). Similar studies were conducted in Malaysia (Khaw et al, 2009), the Philippines (Eknath et al, 2007) and Brazil (Oliveira et al, 2017) where the responses from GIFT fish were evaluated under different environmental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Brazil is a continental country with many options for fish production systems, it is important to evaluate Genotype × Environment to gain insight on better performance in tilapia production since phenotype is a consequence of genotype under the influence of environment (Ponzoni et al, 2008;Oliveira et al, 2017). Similar studies were conducted in Malaysia (Khaw et al, 2009), the Philippines (Eknath et al, 2007) and Brazil (Oliveira et al, 2017) where the responses from GIFT fish were evaluated under different environmental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015), who obtained 338.28 g over a period of 160 days of cultivation of the GIFT variety. The observed difference in weight between the studies with Nile tilapia is due to genetics -varieties (Marengoni et al, 2015), environment (Oliveira et al, 2017) and density and/or production system (Ribeiro, 2001). The greater weight found in families AA10 and AA16 at the fourth and fifth biometric assessments indicates the superiority of these families over the others, especially family AA8 at the fourth biometric assessment (37.2% lower than family AA10) and family AA6 at the fifth assessment (37.1% lower than family AA10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater body width W1 of families AA5, AA16, AA19 and AA20 and body widths W2 and W3 in family AA19 at 133 days; and the greater body widths W2 and W3 in family AA19 and body widths W1 and W2 in family AA10 at 181 days indicate a change in body widths between families from the fourth to the fifth biometric assessment. can perform differently in a given production environment (Oliveira et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%