2010
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.2.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of personality and friendship networks on contextual performance

Abstract: In this research 505 valid questionnaires collected from 17 selected companies including nonprofit organizations, insurance companies, and manufacturing firms were used to gauge the normalized in-degree centrality of a friendship network. Social network analysis techniques were administered. The aim in this research was to present a model of how friendship networks and the personality characteristic of conscientiousness could intensify individual contextual performance of the employee. Theories and research i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contextual performance. All participants were asked three questions that capture contextual performance (modified from Borman and Motowidlo, 1993;Lee et al, 2010). The items were: "Did you have the opportunity to" followed by the item stem: (a) "Volunteer to extra activities?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contextual performance. All participants were asked three questions that capture contextual performance (modified from Borman and Motowidlo, 1993;Lee et al, 2010). The items were: "Did you have the opportunity to" followed by the item stem: (a) "Volunteer to extra activities?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextual performance. All participants were asked three questions that capture contextual performance (modified from Borman and Motowidlo, 1993; Lee et al , 2010). The items were: “Did you have the opportunity to” followed by the item stem: (a) “Volunteer to extra activities?”, (b) “Help and cooperate with others?”, and (c) “Share job related information, knowledge, and experience with other co-workers?”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has linked negative affectivity to peripheral network positions (Venkataramani, Green, & Schleicher, ). Conscientiousness has also been linked to attaining a central position in friendship (Lee, Yang, Wan, & Chen, ) and advice (Liu & Ipe, ) networks. Conscientiousness is characterized by dependability and achievement, so people who are highly dependable and hardworking may emerge as attractive friends and advice partners.…”
Section: Organizing Framework: Brokerage Centrality and Tie Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the workplace, more conscientious individuals are more likely to be key players, such as leaders or experts (Selden and Goodie 2018). In friendship networks, conscientious individuals were found to have higher degree centrality, which explained why they were better able to reach out to their friends for information (Lee et al 2010). Their trustworthiness could make it easier for highly conscientious people to increase others' willingness to invest in them.…”
Section: Personality and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%