2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MPEP and the mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495 on nicotine self-administration and reward deficits associated with nicotine withdrawal in rats

Abstract: Stimulatory actions of nicotine on mesocorticolimbic dopamine transmission are partly mediated by nicotine-induced glutamate release acting on ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors. Because both presynaptic inhibitory mGlu2/3 and postsynaptic excitatory mGlu5 receptors provide potential targets for treatment of aspects of nicotine dependence, we examined interacting effects of mGlu5 (2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine, MPEP) and mGlu2/3 (LY341495) receptor antagonists on nicotine self-adminis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(70 reference statements)
5
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these findings seem to be complementary, we have previously argued that parallels between ICSS and sensory reinforcement should be made judiciously (Palmatier et al, 2007b). For example, the present findings that blockade of mGlu5 receptors did not affect responding for sensory reinforcement per se, may contrast with recent findings from the ICSS paradigm showing that MPEP decreased brain reward function (eg Liechti and Markou, 2007). Arguably, a change in brain reward function induced by the mGluR5 antagonists should have been accompanied by a decrease, or possibly a compensatory increase, in responding for sensory reinforcement (VS-only group).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Although these findings seem to be complementary, we have previously argued that parallels between ICSS and sensory reinforcement should be made judiciously (Palmatier et al, 2007b). For example, the present findings that blockade of mGlu5 receptors did not affect responding for sensory reinforcement per se, may contrast with recent findings from the ICSS paradigm showing that MPEP decreased brain reward function (eg Liechti and Markou, 2007). Arguably, a change in brain reward function induced by the mGluR5 antagonists should have been accompanied by a decrease, or possibly a compensatory increase, in responding for sensory reinforcement (VS-only group).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the effects of the local administration of MPEP into the accumbal shell closely resemble the effects of systemic administration of the drug on responding for a nicotine or food reward (Paterson et al 2003;Paterson and Markou 2005;Liechti and Markou 2007a). Bilateral microinjection of MPEP at a dose of 20 µg per side depressed responding for both nicotine and food whereas doses above or below this had no significant effects on responding for either reinforcer.…”
Section: The Role Of Mglur5 Receptors In the Neural Responses To Nicomentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The administration of mGluR5 antagonists to animals trained to respond for nicotine in an intravenous self-administration paradigm has consistently been shown to result in a dose-dependent attenuation of nicotine-seeking behaviour (Kenny et al 2003;Paterson et al 2003;Tessari et al 2004;Liechti and Markou 2007a;Palmatier et al 2007;Tronci et al 2010). Moreover, pretreatment with the mGluR5 antagonist, MPEP, is reported to decrease the break point for nicotine in a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (Paterson and Markou 2005).…”
Section: The Role Of Mglur5 Receptors In Models Of Nicotine Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EVH1 domain exhibits a high degree of similarity across Homer isoforms and is essential for Homer interactions with a proline-rich sequence (PPSPF) displayed by proteins regulating drug-induced alterations in neuronal morphology, synaptic architecture, and glutamate receptor signaling/intracellular calcium dynamics. Of particular relevance to drug-induced neuroplasticity [e.g., 20,73,74,[78][79][80][81][82][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130], these proteins include the mGluR1a and mGluR5 subtypes of Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) [34,102,104,107,[131][132][133][134][135][136][137], the NMDA glutamate receptor scaffolding protein Shank [38,132,138,139], the inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) receptor, a down-stream mediator of Group1 mGluR signaling [133,[140]…”
Section: Molecular Aspects Of Homer Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%