2022
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of wildfires, season and predator activity shape mule deer movements

Abstract: Wildfires are increasing in size, frequency and severity due to climate change and fire suppression, but the direct and indirect effects on wildlife remain largely unresolved. Fire removes forest canopy, which can improve forage for ungulates but also reduce snow interception, leading to a deeper snowpack and potentially increased vulnerability to predation in winter. If ungulates exhibit predator‐mediated foraging, burns should generally be selected for in summer to access high‐quality forage and avoided in w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(178 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For larger, more mobile species like black‐tailed deer, changes in intensity of use may represent shifts in activity centers, alterations in movement paths, or avoidance of burned areas altogether following wildfire (Jager et al, 2021). As severe fire modifies the structure of vegetation, animals may adjust their navigation of landscapes to minimize risk (Ganz et al, 2022; Kreling et al, 2021) and maximize access to remaining resources (Nimmo et al, 2019). This behavioral response may grant these larger bodied species some level of improved resistance and longer term resilience to quickly leave areas that are recently burned and return when conditions are more favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger, more mobile species like black‐tailed deer, changes in intensity of use may represent shifts in activity centers, alterations in movement paths, or avoidance of burned areas altogether following wildfire (Jager et al, 2021). As severe fire modifies the structure of vegetation, animals may adjust their navigation of landscapes to minimize risk (Ganz et al, 2022; Kreling et al, 2021) and maximize access to remaining resources (Nimmo et al, 2019). This behavioral response may grant these larger bodied species some level of improved resistance and longer term resilience to quickly leave areas that are recently burned and return when conditions are more favorable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach adds to current studies which are starting to consider the more general role of abiotic conditions in altering prey fear landscapes (e.g. Ganz et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated step selection functions take this further, by including animal movement and resource selection parameters in the model, reducing bias, and allowing further estimation and simulation of habitat selection [ 85 , 110 , 111 ]. For each observed step, we generated five random available steps with turning angles drawn from a von Mises distribution and step lengths drawn from a gamma distribution [ 8 , 86 , 112 , 113 ]. For each observed and random step, we extracted covariates from the four landscape maps at the end of the step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%