2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive image segmentation by matching attributed relational graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been used to solve many Computer Vision problems such as interactive natural image segmentation [6], computerassisted colorization [7] and point matching for non-rigid registration [8], among others [9].…”
Section: Fig 2 Data Flow Representing the Implemented Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used to solve many Computer Vision problems such as interactive natural image segmentation [6], computerassisted colorization [7] and point matching for non-rigid registration [8], among others [9].…”
Section: Fig 2 Data Flow Representing the Implemented Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It generates unsatisfactory results when foreground and background have close color distribution. Both maximal similarity-based region merging (MSRM) [22] and mating attributed relational graph (MARG) [23] begin with superpixels (the input image is divided into small homogenous regions). MSRM iteratively merges a region into a neighboring region which has the most similar color histogram and updates the histogram of newly merged region until there is no region to be merged.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular approaches include graph-cut based methods [10][11][12][13][14], edge based methods [15][16][17], random walk based methods [18][19][20], and region based methods [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses SPIHT algorithm, to separate the coefficients. Here an interactive segmentation approach is used to separate ROI (Noma et al, 2012) and not the BG of the image and the two regions are encoded separately using CSPIHT with high bitrate and low bitrate respectively. Finally the two regions are merged to reconstruct the image.…”
Section: Implicit Roi Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%