2023
DOI: 10.3390/math11153375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Internet Framework Proposal of WASPAS Method: A Computational Contribution for Decision-Making Analysis

Abstract: Concerning the development of computational tools and solutions as a decision-making aid, this paper presents the results of the waspasWEB project, which strives to provide decision-makers with a readily accessible mechanism to employ the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method. The social contribution of the project encompasses the development of a user-friendly and publicly accessible internet tool, as well as a package launched on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) to serve the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjective weights are described merely by the preferences of the decisionmakers. Usually, the subjective judgments are mainly based on pairwise comparison methods such as AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) ( Van Nguyen et al, 2023;Tavana et al, 2023), DEMATEL (Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) (Bali et al, 2023;Šmidovnik & Grošelj, 2023), SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) (Alrasheedi et al, 2023;Deveci et al, 2023), PIPRECIA (Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment) (Janovac et al, 2023;Qaddoori & Breesam, 2023), or WASPAS (weighted aggregated sum product assessment) (Alrasheedi et al, 2023;Barbara et al, 2023;Zavadskas et al, 2012). Recently, WASPAS and its different modifications have been broadly employed for several multi-criteria decision-making tasks (Pandurang, 2021;Petrovas & Bausys, 2022;Semenas & Bausys, 2022;Vaid et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Justification For Multiple-criteria Decision-mak...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective weights are described merely by the preferences of the decisionmakers. Usually, the subjective judgments are mainly based on pairwise comparison methods such as AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) ( Van Nguyen et al, 2023;Tavana et al, 2023), DEMATEL (Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) (Bali et al, 2023;Šmidovnik & Grošelj, 2023), SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) (Alrasheedi et al, 2023;Deveci et al, 2023), PIPRECIA (Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment) (Janovac et al, 2023;Qaddoori & Breesam, 2023), or WASPAS (weighted aggregated sum product assessment) (Alrasheedi et al, 2023;Barbara et al, 2023;Zavadskas et al, 2012). Recently, WASPAS and its different modifications have been broadly employed for several multi-criteria decision-making tasks (Pandurang, 2021;Petrovas & Bausys, 2022;Semenas & Bausys, 2022;Vaid et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Justification For Multiple-criteria Decision-mak...mentioning
confidence: 99%