2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.20.956268
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive machine learning for fast and robust cell profiling

Abstract: These authors contributed equally to this work. AbstractProfiling cell morphology is a powerful tool for inferring cell function. However, this technique retains a high barrier to entry. In particular, configuring image processing parameters for optimal cell profiling is susceptible to cognitive biases, and dependent on user experience. Here, we present an interactive machine learning strategy that learns the optimum cell profiling configuration to maximise quality of the cell profiling outcome. The process is… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For viability staining, oospores were first stained with 10 μL of (20x) (FDA) and incubated at 37°C for 20 h. Then, 10 μL of 20 µM TOTO-3 iodide was added to sample and incubated for a further 4 h at 37 °C. The images were analyzed and oospores counted using CellProfiler v3.1.8 (Laux et al, 2020).…”
Section: Oospore Viability Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For viability staining, oospores were first stained with 10 μL of (20x) (FDA) and incubated at 37°C for 20 h. Then, 10 μL of 20 µM TOTO-3 iodide was added to sample and incubated for a further 4 h at 37 °C. The images were analyzed and oospores counted using CellProfiler v3.1.8 (Laux et al, 2020).…”
Section: Oospore Viability Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%