2014
DOI: 10.1038/515151ax
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive notebooks: Sharing the code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments on interactive notebooks [She14] have set a trend towards reproducible and shareable data analytics. InsideInsights continues this trend by allowing the creation of data‐driven reports that can be accessed by many different users, thereby making data analytics accessible to a wider audience.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments on interactive notebooks [She14] have set a trend towards reproducible and shareable data analytics. InsideInsights continues this trend by allowing the creation of data‐driven reports that can be accessed by many different users, thereby making data analytics accessible to a wider audience.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The record of origin or provenance of the results of published articles is often only provided at a high level in current articles, missing important details due to lack of space, or to the ambiguity inherent in natural language text. Interactive notebooks are gaining popularity, including iPhython Notebook for Python [ Shen , ], Sweave for R in Latex [ Leisch , ; Falcon , ], and the Computable Document Format for Mathematica [ Wolfram , ]. Executable papers are designed to enable readers to run experiments [ Koop et al ., ].…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide body of literature has been published in high‐impact scientific journals over the past few years on the general subject of promoting transparent and trustworthy science results. Much of the discussion has revolved around the importance of scientific reproducibility [ Ioannidis et al ., ; Hutson , ; Mesirov , ; Jasny et al ., ; Russell , ; Collins and Tabak , ; Buck , ] and on the need for data sharing [ Kattge et al ., ; Scientific Data , ] and software sharing [ Barnes , ; Ince et al ., ; Easterbrook , ; Nature , ; Nature Geoscience , ; Shen , ; Hey and Payne , ]. One of the outcomes of these discussions—as well as a contributor to its liveliness—has been new government mandates on increased sharing of digital products resulting from publicly funded research [e.g., Holdren , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such information is typically embedded in the text of research papers with the inherent ambiguity of natural languages [ Ince et al ., ] and with the restricted length of the “Methods” section. Yet the explicit computational representation of research methods is increasingly becoming practical thanks to tools such as interactive notebooks [ Shen , ]. Finally, open access to digital research products implies careful choice of licenses to clarify permissions and restrictions intended by the authors [ Stodden , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%