2006
DOI: 10.1007/11762256_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Ontology-Based User Knowledge Acquisition: A Case Study

Abstract: Abstract. On the Semantic Web personalization technologies are needed to deal with user diversity. Our research aims at maximising the automation of acquisition of user knowledge, thus providing an effective solution for multi-faceted user modeling. This paper presents an approach to eliciting a user's conceptualization by engaging in an ontology-driven dialog. This is implemented as an OWL-based domainindependent diagnostic agent. We show the deployment of the agent in a use case for personalized management o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The formalization of the dialogue game can be expressed also as a 5-tuple (Aroyo et al 2005) < P, U, C, S, R > where -P are the pre-conditions necessary to trigger the game; -U are the strategies for selecting the concepts to exchange in the game; -Cis the focus, the set of all possible concepts that can be exchanged during the dialogue; -S are the scopes, a subset of focus concepts; -R are the post-conditions, the actions to perform at the end of the game.…”
Section: If (Belief < 07) Then {Communicativeacts_list = Addcommunimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The formalization of the dialogue game can be expressed also as a 5-tuple (Aroyo et al 2005) < P, U, C, S, R > where -P are the pre-conditions necessary to trigger the game; -U are the strategies for selecting the concepts to exchange in the game; -Cis the focus, the set of all possible concepts that can be exchanged during the dialogue; -S are the scopes, a subset of focus concepts; -R are the post-conditions, the actions to perform at the end of the game.…”
Section: If (Belief < 07) Then {Communicativeacts_list = Addcommunimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In education and training, the empowering role of Semantic Web technologies has been already acknowledged [1]. Since WWW is becoming a popular educational medium at schools, universities and professional training institutions, a prominent new stream of research on the Educational Semantic Web has been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since WWW is becoming a popular educational medium at schools, universities and professional training institutions, a prominent new stream of research on the Educational Semantic Web has been established. Research studies already report semantic-based annotation and sharing of learning resources [1,11,12]. To further illustrate this potential, there is a need for implementing state-of-the-art Semantic Web technologies in large-scale applications that involve the semantic annotation of big collections of learning resources and their access and use from existing communities of users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are adaptive systems designed to make personal recommendations by acquiring user's knowledge. In these systems, shortterm and long-term log of user actions were kept in layers of ontologies (Aroyo, Denaux, Dimitrova, & Pye, 2006;Aroyo, Dicheva, & Cristea, 2002). Using the information about content or user traces can be useful to make automated decisions on instruction, but this point of view misses a critical detail.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aroyo et al (2006, p. 573) discussed the need to "…focus on the development of a good classification of user's mismatches and patterns for clarification dialog based on systematic studies of empirical and computational approaches for ontology aligning and reconciliation. " Researchers strongly recommend future research on using ontology in E-learning systems and evaluating it with student input (Aroyo et al, 2006;Kholief, Nada, & Khedr, 2012;Kumaran & Sankar, 2013;Yalcinalp & Gulbahar, 2010). There are, however, no studies that have directly focused on addressing student achievement or competency by using actual data collected from end-users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%