2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive role of diabetes mellitus and female sex in the risk of cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based nested case-control study

Abstract: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the role of DM in a population with a lower incidence of ECC remains unclear. We investigated the role of DM and other risk factors for ECC and ICC by conducting a population-based, nested, case–control study in Taiwan, a region with a lower incidence but a higher proportion of ICC. We identified patients who received a diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research data were collected during the period from 1992 to 2014, involving a total of 330896 participants. Two studies reported no significant association between NAFLD and ICC [22,25], but the remaining six studies showed a significant association [6,9,12,23,32,36]. Our meta-analysis showed that NAFLD was a risk factor for ICC with pooled OR of 2.23 (95% CI 1.65-3.02; I 2 =76%) (Fig.…”
Section: Nafldmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The research data were collected during the period from 1992 to 2014, involving a total of 330896 participants. Two studies reported no significant association between NAFLD and ICC [22,25], but the remaining six studies showed a significant association [6,9,12,23,32,36]. Our meta-analysis showed that NAFLD was a risk factor for ICC with pooled OR of 2.23 (95% CI 1.65-3.02; I 2 =76%) (Fig.…”
Section: Nafldmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…1). Of the 32 included studies, nine were conducted in the United States [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], eight in China [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], four in Taiwan (China) [23][24][25][26], three in Korea [27][28][29], two in Italy [30,31], three in Japan [32][33][34], one in Denmark [35], and one in 10 European countries [36]. The characteristics of the 32 included studies are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two hundred and three studies were excluded due to the following reasons: NAFLD was not assessed in the study (n = 149); the case group was not diagnosed with CCA (n = 25); no control group in the study (n = 13); and irrelevant study (n = 16). There were ten potential relevant studies, of which studies from Chaiteerakij et al [14] and Haung et al [15] were excluded because their patient cohort was a part of the cohort in studies of Choi et al [16] and Chang et al [17], respectively (detail in Additional file 2: Data S3). Finally, eight studies met the criteria: seven case-control studies and one cohort study.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%