2010
DOI: 10.1145/1764848.1764855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive surfaces and tangibles

Abstract: Tap. Slide. Swipe. Shake. Tangible user interfaces have some scientists toying around with stuff you can really put your hands on.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite all the aforementioned affordances, and considering all the multi-task desirable properties, the majority of the currently available shareable interface systems created for research purposes, consist of a single program that already includes all the necessary facilities to cover every subtask of the main activity. This is, however, consistent with the purpose of most research, because, in a collaboration co-located setting, CSCW researchers typically focus their investigations on the human factors in multi-user interaction, such as how input devices can be more effectively distributed between users in order to optimize group dynamics (Kim and Snow 2013;Verma et al 2013), or on studying different strategies to access digital and physical items from the perspective of digital content sharing (Verma et al 2013), control sharing (Jordà et al 2010;Kim and Snow 2013), or proxemics (Ballendat et al 2010).…”
Section: Multi-tasking In Shareable Interfaces: Current Situation Andmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite all the aforementioned affordances, and considering all the multi-task desirable properties, the majority of the currently available shareable interface systems created for research purposes, consist of a single program that already includes all the necessary facilities to cover every subtask of the main activity. This is, however, consistent with the purpose of most research, because, in a collaboration co-located setting, CSCW researchers typically focus their investigations on the human factors in multi-user interaction, such as how input devices can be more effectively distributed between users in order to optimize group dynamics (Kim and Snow 2013;Verma et al 2013), or on studying different strategies to access digital and physical items from the perspective of digital content sharing (Verma et al 2013), control sharing (Jordà et al 2010;Kim and Snow 2013), or proxemics (Ballendat et al 2010).…”
Section: Multi-tasking In Shareable Interfaces: Current Situation Andmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A TUI is defined as an interface that allows users to interact with non-physical information though physical means (Ishii 2008;Ishii and Ullmer 1997); such interfaces may foster strong collaborative learning experiences (Jordà, Julià, and Gallardo 2010). TUIs have been applied to geographic visualizations in the past; much of this research focuses on providing tangible, graspable objects for manipulation (Cheok and others 2002;Ullmer and Ishii 2000;Ishii and Ullmer 1997).…”
Section: Tangible User Interfaces In Geographic Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With people interacting with multi-touch surfaces more freely and with fewer reservations as before with traditional graphical user interfaces (Jordà, Julià, & Gallardo, 2010), it seems appropriate to enrich interaction with fingers by making it possible to execute more involved functions. Currently, only standard manipulation gestures for rotating, scaling, and translation have been established as natural interaction with multi-touch devices.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%