2014
DOI: 10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-01-05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Technology. Traditional Practice?

Abstract: In this paper, we examine findings on the pedagogical use of interactive whiteboards and tablets in schools, gathered over the last five years. The findings reveal how challenging it can be to utilise the opportunities provided by interactive technology. The paper then introduces two case studies focusing on how teachers prepare when beginning to use interactive technologies. Both cases show how teachers develop new ways of using the technology in a pedagogical setting, but also how they face challenges in ter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the initial workshop were in line with Gudmundsdóttir et al (2014) -results reveal that teaching practices could tend to remain traditional, with little innovation even though many teachers tried to increase their social presence, vary the lesson design and increase the online interaction. The actual shift in adoption was observed during the shift to ERT.…”
Section: Photo 1 Sample Of Design For Variation Photo 2 Sample Of Des...supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The results from the initial workshop were in line with Gudmundsdóttir et al (2014) -results reveal that teaching practices could tend to remain traditional, with little innovation even though many teachers tried to increase their social presence, vary the lesson design and increase the online interaction. The actual shift in adoption was observed during the shift to ERT.…”
Section: Photo 1 Sample Of Design For Variation Photo 2 Sample Of Des...supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Thus, if they are not given a chance to develop these skills with TPACK, their language learning might be impoverished. Learners do not read or write with comprehension when they are not exposed to interactive learning (Guðmundsdóttir et al, 2014;van den Berghe et al, 2018).…”
Section: Implications For Efal Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, learners are expected to participate actively and engage in the learning process. However, it is not clear if language teachers are making progress in applying digital literacy strategies and competencies, because they are used to traditional ways of teaching (Guðmundsdóttir et al, 2014;Whyte, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases, the iPad has ended up like so many other technology hypes in the education sector: the object of unrealistic optimism about its effects on learning and teaching, followed by let-downs in implementation and, eventually, abandonment by teachers (Falloon, 2013;Gasparini & Culén, 2012;Guðmundsdóttir, Dalaaker, Egeberg, Hatlevik, & Tømte, 2014). The potential for educational change ascribed to mobile devices has yet to be fulfilled, and teachers have been criticised for using such devices merely to supplement and reproduce traditional teaching methods (Flewitt, Messer, & Kucirkova, 2015;Helleve, 2013;Kongsgården & Krumsvik 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%