2021
DOI: 10.1109/toh.2021.3060625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Vibrotactile Feedback Enhances the Perceived Quality of a Surface for Musical Expression and the Playing Experience

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results show generally smaller effects than previous studies concerning a digital piano [13] and a haptic surface for musical expression [12]. A key difference is that those studies compared a haptic feedback condition with a setup lacking vibration entirely.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results show generally smaller effects than previous studies concerning a digital piano [13] and a haptic surface for musical expression [12]. A key difference is that those studies compared a haptic feedback condition with a setup lacking vibration entirely.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…The present authors previously conducted several assessments of the relevance of vibration to the perceived quality of musical instruments, to the performer's experience, and performance. In doing so, we addressed various digital musical interfaces and instruments augmented with vibrotactile feedback-either self-developed [11], or existing advanced ones [12]-as well as acoustic and digital pianos [13]. Generally, it was found that vibration consistent with the produced sound can indeed enhance the player's engagement, their connection with the instrument, and its overall perceived quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean responses were estimated by Bayesian inference using a zero-one-inflated beta (ZOIB) model Kruschke (2014); Liu and Kong (2015); Ospina and Ferrari (2010). The model and detailed results are described in Papetti et al (2021). On average, the vibrating setups were preferred to their nonvibrating versions: In fact, all mean estimates but one are above 0.50 (the point of perceived equality), as well as most of the respective credible intervals 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While looking at this pervasive overlap between accurate physical interaction and creative context, this paper summarizes results proposed by the authors over recent years in form of design, application, and evaluation of various digital musical interfaces Fontana et al (2015); Järveläinen et al (2022); Papetti et al ( , 2021. In contrast to most previous studies on the topic, our research aimed to achieve a high level of scientific rigor, with the goal of producing a solid foundation of empirical evidence that can be replicated by other researchers and practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También es frecuente el uso de wearables o dispositivos adaptables al cuerpo para transmitir el ritmo musical (ver Ilustración 6), observándose que no todas las partes del cuerpo son susceptibles de aportar una mejora en la experiencia musical (Alves Arujo et al, 2017;Trivedi et al, 2019;De Guglielmo et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2021;Turchet et al, 2021). Otro tipo de dispositivo son pequeñas plataformas vibradoras para las manos (Papetti, 2021) o para los pies (Hopkins et al, 2016;Mariscal Rock, 2017), que según han demostrado algunos estudios proporcionan una experiencia musical más enriquecedora (Cavdir, 2022;Remache-Vinueza et al, 2022). En estos dispositivos se transmite una señal vibro-táctil que mapea la señal acústica.…”
Section: Dispositivos Vibrotáctiles Para Compartir Músicaunclassified