2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21608-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Visualization–A Key Prerequisite for Reconstruction and Analysis of Anatomically Realistic Neural Networks

Abstract: Recent progress in large-volume microscopy, tissue-staining, as well as in image processing methods and 3D anatomy reconstruction allow neuroscientists to extract previously inaccessible anatomical data with high precision. For instance, determination of neuron numbers, 3D distributions and 3D axonal and dendritic branching patterns support recently started efforts to reconstruct anatomically realistic network models of many thousand neurons. Such models aid in understanding neural network structure, and, by n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Axons were traced using an automated pipeline ( Oberlaender et al 2007 ; Oberlaender, Broser, et al 2009 ). Manual postprocessing of individual sections ( Dercksen et al 2012 ) and automated alignment of branches across sections ( Dercksen et al 2009 ), were performed in Amira visualization software ( Stalling et al 2005 ). Pia and barrel outlines were manually drawn on low resolution images (2×) and added to the tracings in Neurolucida software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axons were traced using an automated pipeline ( Oberlaender et al 2007 ; Oberlaender, Broser, et al 2009 ). Manual postprocessing of individual sections ( Dercksen et al 2012 ) and automated alignment of branches across sections ( Dercksen et al 2009 ), were performed in Amira visualization software ( Stalling et al 2005 ). Pia and barrel outlines were manually drawn on low resolution images (2×) and added to the tracings in Neurolucida software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each section, stacks of ~1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 0.05 mm were imaged using optimized mosaic optical-sectioning microscopy (Oberlaender et al, 2009) and an oil-immersion objective (Olympus 100× UPLAN S APO, NA 1.4), yielding a voxel size of 0.184 μm × 0.184 μm × 0.5 μm. Manual postprocessing of individual sections (Dercksen et al, 2012), as well as automated alignment of reconstructed branches across sections (Dercksen et al, 2009), was performed using a custom-designed three-dimensional (3D) editing environment based on ZIBamira visualization software v2010.06 (Zuse Institute Berlin). Pia and barrel outlines were manually traced in each section at low resolution (Olympus 4× UPLAN S APO, NA 0.16) and added to the tracings in Neurolucida software (MicroBrightfield).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases in which neuronal branches reached the borders of the imaged volume, additional image stacks were taken at adjacent areas. Manual postprocessing of individual sections (62), as well as automated alignment of reconstructed branches across sections (63), were performed by using a custom-designed 3D editing environment based on Amira visualization software (64). Pia and barrel outlines were manually drawn on low-resolution images and added to the tracings in Neurolucida software (MicroBrightfield).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%