2016 29th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/sibgrapi.2016.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive Visualization of the Cranio-Cerebral Correspondences for 10/20, 10/10 and 10/5 Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We took advantage of a pre‐existing neuroimaging dataset taken from a combined EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, using 64 channel fixed electrode caps with a 10‐10 electrode layout (Scrivener et al., 2021 ). Whilst several groups have developed methods to recover EEG electrode positions from simultaneous EEG‐fMRI data using specific MRI acquisition methods (Butler et al., 2017 ) or reconstruction from acquired structural scans (Bhutada et al., 2020 ; Brinkmann et al., 1998 ; de Munck et al., 2012 ; Jurcak et al., 2005 ; Koessler et al., 2008 ; Kozinska et al., 2001 ; Lamm et al., 2001 ; Marino et al., 2016 ; Silva et al., 2016 ; Whalen et al., 2008 ), these approaches often require methods and toolboxes that are not yet widely used. As such, we additionally highlight a novel and simple way of projecting electrode locations to the cortical surface using electrode gel artifacts (that appear on the MR image underlying electrode positions) and commercially available equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took advantage of a pre‐existing neuroimaging dataset taken from a combined EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, using 64 channel fixed electrode caps with a 10‐10 electrode layout (Scrivener et al., 2021 ). Whilst several groups have developed methods to recover EEG electrode positions from simultaneous EEG‐fMRI data using specific MRI acquisition methods (Butler et al., 2017 ) or reconstruction from acquired structural scans (Bhutada et al., 2020 ; Brinkmann et al., 1998 ; de Munck et al., 2012 ; Jurcak et al., 2005 ; Koessler et al., 2008 ; Kozinska et al., 2001 ; Lamm et al., 2001 ; Marino et al., 2016 ; Silva et al., 2016 ; Whalen et al., 2008 ), these approaches often require methods and toolboxes that are not yet widely used. As such, we additionally highlight a novel and simple way of projecting electrode locations to the cortical surface using electrode gel artifacts (that appear on the MR image underlying electrode positions) and commercially available equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 15(b The test setup of the first Test subject-1 is shown in Figure . 15(a). The subject is wearing the headwear making sure that the frontal EEG electrode is placed precisely at FP1 [17,27]. Before electrode placement, the skin at FP1 is cleaned with cotton to reduce skin impedance.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrodes that need to be placed on the scalp of the head are followed by an internationally recognized standard known as the 10-20 system [17]. This system is strictly in relation to the location of the electrodes and the cerebral cortex.…”
Section: The 10-20 System Of Electrode Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations