Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on 3D Web Technology 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2010425.2010449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive visualization of volumetric data with WebGL in real-time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WebGL provides hardware-based rendering, allowing fast and real-time visualizations. WebGL is designed for dynamic web applications (Parisi, 2012), and examples have been developed to implement 3D interactive visualization using WebGL (e.g., Congote et al, 2011;Birr et al, 2012;Henning et al,2013).…”
Section: Webgl Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WebGL provides hardware-based rendering, allowing fast and real-time visualizations. WebGL is designed for dynamic web applications (Parisi, 2012), and examples have been developed to implement 3D interactive visualization using WebGL (e.g., Congote et al, 2011;Birr et al, 2012;Henning et al,2013).…”
Section: Webgl Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since WebGL is based on the OpenGL ES 2.0 API which is a restricted subset of the desktop OpenGL, there are some functionalities missing, in particular, there is no 3D texture which is a crucial requirement for volume rendering. As shown in the figure, in our design, this limitation is circumvented by tiling each slice of the 3D texture into a 2D flat texture layout [9].…”
Section: B Volume Renderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first set of experiments was conducted on both SYSTEM1 and SYSTEM2 to compare the performance of our single pass GPU ray caster against the current state-of-the-art WebGL ray caster [9]. For this experiment, we used the composite rendering mode with transfer function (shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Single-pass Ray Caster To Multi-pass Ray Camentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations