Interactivity and Branding: Public Political Communication as a Marketing Tool

Abstract

Effective communication is essential for brands to gain awareness, interest and loyalty from their consumers; the same is as true for politics as for any manufacturer or service provider. The challenge for political parties and candidates seeking support or election is finding the means to transmit their messages to an increasingly hard to reach audience. The consumer within a political context may avoid hard news or broadcast political debate, discard any direct mail received and, when receiving glimpses of political communication, simple reject any political messages as spin and propaganda. In order that brand values are accepted and understood and accepted effective, unmediated communication is crucial and increasingly political communication strategists are turning to the Internet which can not only enable the reaching of a wider audience but can also complement and augment the brand character.As new technologies are adopted, new modes of communication are also introduced. While a website can act as a shop front from which parties or candidates can advertise their policies and personnel, the style of the site (design, language and features) can act as metaphors for the professionalism and style of representation offered. To appear modern parties are increasingly adopting Web 2.0 tools, platforms and features. These all permit, to differing degrees, users to interact with parties and candidates and have conversations across online platforms. This interactivity can, if used strategically, be used as a tool for branding a party or candidate given that the uses of such tools can be metaphors for openness, accessibility and the representational character that may be provided post election. We explore this issue drawing on original empirical data gathered through analyses of online activities during the French and US presidential contests of and of UK parties and MPs during 2008. Through a process of creating narratives for each of the brands analysed, based upon a content and discourse analysis of the websites and other online presences, we identify what characteristics the online shop front is designed to project. These narratives, cumulatively, suggest that the online environment is becoming a key communicational tool for those who seek election, and potentially a key source of information for the voter; thus an important location to place strategic branded information. However it appears that interactivity is better suited to the activities of candidates, nationally or locally, due to the individualistic nature of conversational interactivity. Interactivity can thus have a significant role to play within a presidential contest where the individual is seeking office, but when representatives attempt to construct their individual brand it can also challenge traditional hierarchies within party based parliamentary systems such as the UK. Interactivity and Branding, public political communication as a marketing toolCommunicating the Political Brand While it may not be common to view politicians or politic...

What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions

“…References to external actors may have a similar function, as they provide followers with different views. As political actors use Facebook for marketing purposes, however, they may also highlight the superiority of their own policy preferences and mobilize similar views (Lilleker, 2015). However, references to political competitors may be confounded with negativity (Stieglitz & Dang-Xuan, 2013).…”

Comparing online campaigning: The evolution of interactive campaigning from Royal to Obama to Hollande

“…The Obama site may have been a big conversation but there was very little political discussion and the network was not used to test out political ideas or to suggest policy. The Obama utilisation of the online environment was about securing victory using what may be seen as relational marketing tools (Lilleker, 2015) not about building an interactive political movement despite appearances.…”

“…Campaigns can communicate to and gain feedback on dimensions of their campaign, including policy, which engages citizens and increases the likelihood of them converting to being loyal supporters (Lilleker, 2015). Loyal supporters are in turn likely to extend the reach of a campaign via social media, through any actions (likes and shares) and interactions being visible within the network of Q3 the citizen and thus in turn citizens play the role of advocate (Norris and Curtice, 2008).…”

Political Marketing and the 2015 UK General Election

“…In the party's 40/40 target seats, there was an intensive direct marketing both on-and offl ine. Lilleker ( 2015a ) notes that this created an informed elite serviced with targeted political information. In the run-up to 2015 General Election, many of the voters that engaged in some form of e-politics in the marginal battlegrounds would have fallen into this category.…”