2019
DOI: 10.1177/1077699019835911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactivity as a Double-Edged Sword: Parsing Out the Effects of Modality Interactivity on Anti-Smoking Message Processing and Persuasion

Abstract: This study combines the heuristic-systematic model of persuasion with user interface literature to examine how website interactivity influences processing of anti-smoking messages and smoking outcome beliefs. We conducted a pilot experiment with 112 current smokers and found that the interactive website elicited more heuristic processing among participants, which diminished their outcome beliefs and website attitudes. However, their positive interface perception functioned as a salient cue that led to greater … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Absorption was the only cognitive mediator related to interactivity levels, with modality interactivity negatively predicting absorption, temporal dissociation in particular. The presence of modality interactivity features can potentially lead to information scanning behaviors, and attention may have been diverted from the content of the message [37]. The inclusion of arrows on the slideshows and allowing the participants to click through them at their own pace may have allowed the participants to spend less time on the content presented in the slideshow than those in the low modality interactivity condition who had to watch the slideshow at its pre-set pace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Absorption was the only cognitive mediator related to interactivity levels, with modality interactivity negatively predicting absorption, temporal dissociation in particular. The presence of modality interactivity features can potentially lead to information scanning behaviors, and attention may have been diverted from the content of the message [37]. The inclusion of arrows on the slideshows and allowing the participants to click through them at their own pace may have allowed the participants to spend less time on the content presented in the slideshow than those in the low modality interactivity condition who had to watch the slideshow at its pre-set pace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on the relationship between modality interactivity and the ELM suggests that central processing can still prevail, but in a biased manner where the presence of modality interactivity acts as a heuristic cue to improve users' willingness to invest time and effort into the website, thus increasing the likelihood of elaboration [12,37,40]. Alternatively, when it comes to the specific interactive features used in this study, absorption and elaboration may not be key mechanisms for how engaging with the website leads to persuasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic Processing. Participants indicated their agreement on a 7-point Likert-type scale with five statements, such as "I thought about what actions I might take based on the information," and "I thought about how the information related to other things I know" (Oh et al, 2019) (α = .81, M = 5.01, SD = 1.29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can determine the extent to which content is understood, and post-message attitudes endure. A more recent extension of the heuristic-systematic model is its application to understanding how modality interactivity can positively affect a patient's ability to process messages [24]. As telehealth-delivered VCs offer a highly interactive message format, it may increase the patient ability to process CRC screening information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%