2012
DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05212h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactome-wide prediction of short, disordered protein interaction motifs in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These regions often constitute functional, evolutionary and structural units (hence the name “domain”), and were thought to clearly differ from shorter elements, in particular linear motifs (3–11aa) [98], through their binding mode, affinity, and the fact that they arise by homologous descent rather than convergent evolution [95]. Reliable in silico identification of disordered domains would be a major advance because they mediate numerous (possibly thousands) of crucial but poorly characterized protein-protein interactions [99]. So far their detection has been restricted to domains longer than 20–30aa [95] because similarities detected between shorter regions are not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions often constitute functional, evolutionary and structural units (hence the name “domain”), and were thought to clearly differ from shorter elements, in particular linear motifs (3–11aa) [98], through their binding mode, affinity, and the fact that they arise by homologous descent rather than convergent evolution [95]. Reliable in silico identification of disordered domains would be a major advance because they mediate numerous (possibly thousands) of crucial but poorly characterized protein-protein interactions [99]. So far their detection has been restricted to domains longer than 20–30aa [95] because similarities detected between shorter regions are not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Despite the considerable success of these approaches, in many cases, the stereochemical basis of even dominant specificity determinants remains obscure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one, such networks typically rely on highly specific and dynamic protein-protein interactions to be able to quickly transmit information within the cell (Smock and Gierasch 2009; Stein et al 2009). This is in part supported by the utilization of low affinity protein-protein interactions that involve compact (3–20 amino acid long), degenerate and evolvable modules that have been defined as S hort L inear M otifs (SLIMs) (Diella et al 2008; Davey et al 2012; Edwards et al 2012; Van Roey et al 2012; Weatheritt et al 2012a; Weatheritt et al 2012b; Van Roey et al 2013). Most of the binding specificity and affinity of a SLiM is embedded within a 2–5 residue-long core of amino acids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the binding specificity and affinity of a SLiM is embedded within a 2–5 residue-long core of amino acids. This paucity of amino acids limits the strength of SLiM-mediated interactions to a relatively low affinity range (1–150 μM) that supports transiency and reversibility of SLiM mediated protein-protein binding (Diella et al 2008; Davey et al 2012; Edwards et al 2012; Van Roey et al 2012; Weatheritt et al 2012a; Weatheritt et al 2012b; Van Roey et al 2013; Dinkel et al 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%