2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1312213111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity

Abstract: Although temporal heterogeneity is a well-accepted driver of biodiversity, effects of interannual variation in land-use intensity (LUI) have not been addressed yet. Additionally, responses to land use can differ greatly among different organisms; therefore, overall effects of land-use on total local biodiversity are hardly known. To test for effects of LUI (quantified as the combined intensity of fertilization, grazing, and mowing) and interannual variation in LUI (SD in LUI across time), we introduce a unique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
270
5
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
270
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To make all plots comparable through a common land-use metric and due to high correlation between them, the three land-use factors were aggregated into a compound land-use intensity index (LUI; Blu¨thgen et al 2012) that summed the three land-use components, each standardized by its mean value within each region (Appendix A). This index has been found to be a better predictor of biodiversity responses in these grasslands than its individual components (Blu¨thgen et al 2012, Allan et al 2014). …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To make all plots comparable through a common land-use metric and due to high correlation between them, the three land-use factors were aggregated into a compound land-use intensity index (LUI; Blu¨thgen et al 2012) that summed the three land-use components, each standardized by its mean value within each region (Appendix A). This index has been found to be a better predictor of biodiversity responses in these grasslands than its individual components (Blu¨thgen et al 2012, Allan et al 2014). …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We then divided grasslands into smaller groups based upon their land-use intensity and examined how land-use intensity altered these relationships. Finally, we assessed the correlation of the biodiversity of each taxa with a new metric of total ecosystem diversity, multidiversity (Allan et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relatively modest effects we found can be explained by the weak influence of grazing on the richness component of the compositional metric, probably due to idiosyncratic responses of many different taxa to grazing. For example, intensive grazing associated with agricultural activities has been shown to substantially reduce richness of plants, lichens, and insects (e.g., Orthoptera and Lepidoptera), but not Diptera, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or bats (Allan et al 2014). Grazing-induced increases in ants of the dominant Dolichorine group could buffer reductions in cryptic, grazing-sensitive species, resulting in no net change in richness (Bromham et al 1999, Seymour and Dean 1999, Nash et al 2004.…”
Section: Compositional Structural and Functional Responses To Grazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managed ecosystems are, however, subject to spatio-temporal changes in species numbers [8], especially if management intensity varies over time [9]. For example, cessation of management such as fertilizer or pesticide input may lead to increases in plant biodiversity from species-poor states [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%