The Handbook of Speech Production 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118584156.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interarticulatory Coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the finding that the coefficient representing the cohesive ties of two cluster gestures is close to 1 suggests an independent recruitment and vulnerability of both gestures, i.e., no integration, in patients with AOS. This does not preclude that gestures in consonant clusters are organized as cohesive units in healthy speakers (Hoole & Pouplier, 2015). However, the data suggest, for example, that the ties between a tongue back closure and glottal aperture gesture in the production of /k/, with a coefficient considerably greater than 1, are stronger than those between the same tongue back gesture and a tongue tip closure in /kn/.…”
Section: Model Shapementioning
confidence: 77%
“…For example, the finding that the coefficient representing the cohesive ties of two cluster gestures is close to 1 suggests an independent recruitment and vulnerability of both gestures, i.e., no integration, in patients with AOS. This does not preclude that gestures in consonant clusters are organized as cohesive units in healthy speakers (Hoole & Pouplier, 2015). However, the data suggest, for example, that the ties between a tongue back closure and glottal aperture gesture in the production of /k/, with a coefficient considerably greater than 1, are stronger than those between the same tongue back gesture and a tongue tip closure in /kn/.…”
Section: Model Shapementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, we assume that ident-gcd/[V_V Stem ] now ranks below *{H,Z}-V in the phonological grammars of present-day Spanish varieties. To help identify predicted cross-dialectal patterns of allophonic voicing and aspiration in contemporary Spanish, we used OTSoft (Hayes et al, 2013) to compute a factorial typology of coupling constraints ( 14) but excluding the CS-specific morphologically sensitive constraint (18). From 120 logically possible rankings, only six distinct output patterns emerged, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Typological Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%