Carbon-Based Nanoelectromagnetics 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102393-8.00004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interband transitions in narrow-gap carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoribbons

Abstract: Interband transitions in narrow-gap carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoribbons We use the robust nearest-neighbour tight-binding approximation to study on the same footing interband dipole transitions in narrow-bandgap carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoribbons. It is demonstrated that curvature effects in metallic singlewalled carbon nanotubes and edge effects in gapless graphene nanoribbons not only open up bang gaps, which typically correspond to THz frequencies, but also result in a giant enhancement of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, graphene and graphene‐like gapped 2D Dirac materials are theoretically predicted to exhibit similar behavior, owing to the pseudospin. [ 16 ] For WSe 2 , according to Fermi's Golden Rule, the transition rate W ( k ) for an electron with a wave vector k is given, to first‐order time‐dependent perturbation theory by W k=2πe2Iechv2 P·ψCk||truev^ψvk2δEcboldnormalkEvboldnormalkhv Here, the ψ C and ψ V ( E C and E V ) are the wave functions (energies) of conduction and valence bands, respectively. P is the polarization vector of the incident light, which is parallel to the crystal's surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, graphene and graphene‐like gapped 2D Dirac materials are theoretically predicted to exhibit similar behavior, owing to the pseudospin. [ 16 ] For WSe 2 , according to Fermi's Golden Rule, the transition rate W ( k ) for an electron with a wave vector k is given, to first‐order time‐dependent perturbation theory by W k=2πe2Iechv2 P·ψCk||truev^ψvk2δEcboldnormalkEvboldnormalkhv Here, the ψ C and ψ V ( E C and E V ) are the wave functions (energies) of conduction and valence bands, respectively. P is the polarization vector of the incident light, which is parallel to the crystal's surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies show that at the low energy regime the angular generation density g is g = F0ε0[]1+α0cos2θ where α0 = Eg24ε02Eg2+4ε02 defines the degree of momentum alignment, θ is the angle between the momentum of the photo‐excited electron and the polarization direction of the incident light, F 0 (ε 0 ) is the total density of carriers created at energy ε 0 , and subscript 0 means that no relaxation has occurred. [ 16 ] As illustrated in Figure 2b, a linearly polarized incident light is expected to generate an anisotropic distribution of photo‐excited EHPs, where the momentum direction of carriers is preferentially perpendicular to the polarization direction of incident light. Indeed, the pseudospin‐related optical transition selection rules of WSe 2 induce the optical momentum alignment effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations