“…The result indicated that the CT60/GO membrane has a stable separation performance. However, the XRD result indicated that the d -spacing of the membrane increased to 12.3 Å (Figure S10), which was potentially due to the invasion of dye molecules into the gap between GO nanosheets. , Figure c compares the CT60/GO membrane with prevailing GO-based membranes in terms of pure water permeance and MB selectivity. ,,,− Moreover, the performance of the CT/GO membrane was also compared against membranes based on other nanomaterials, such as MXene and covalent organic frameworks (COFs), as shown in Table S5. The pure water permeance of the CT60/GO membrane was 171.5 L m –2 h –1 bar –1 and the MB rejection was 96.2%, suggesting the superior water permeance of the CT60/GO membrane and its application feasibility for dye separation.…”