1988
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889888004820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercalibration of small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering data

Abstract: Absolute calibration forms a valuable diagnostic tool in small-angle scattering experiments and allows the parameters of a given model to be restricted to the set which reproduces the observed intensity. General methods which are available for absolute scaling of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data are reviewed along with estimates of the degree of internal consistency which may be achieved between the various standards. In order to minimize the time devoted to calibration in a given experimental program,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
130
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
130
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of either have been well explained by Dreiss et al [42]. The most straightforward method is using a secondary standard such as Lupolen or calibrated glassy carbon samples [152,204], as they do not require detailed knowledge on detector behaviour and beam profiles, and scatter significantly allowing for rapid collection of sufficient intensity to perform the calibration. The scattering of these samples in absolute intensity units is determined separately, and its calibrated datafile should come with the sample [195,204].…”
Section: Polarization Correction: Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discussion of the benefits and drawbacks of either have been well explained by Dreiss et al [42]. The most straightforward method is using a secondary standard such as Lupolen or calibrated glassy carbon samples [152,204], as they do not require detailed knowledge on detector behaviour and beam profiles, and scatter significantly allowing for rapid collection of sufficient intensity to perform the calibration. The scattering of these samples in absolute intensity units is determined separately, and its calibrated datafile should come with the sample [195,204].…”
Section: Polarization Correction: Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After azimuthal averaging, the raw data were corrected for detector noise, absorption, and background noise [15]. The data were then placed on an absolute scale using a type 2 glassy carbon sample 1.07 mm thick, previously calibrated at the advanced photon source in the Argonne National Laboratory, as a secondary standard [16].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can also be used to place results on an absolute scale. This has been described in reviews by Wignall & Bates (1987), Russell et al (1988) and Glinka et al (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%