Intercept Method—A Novel Technique To Correct Steady-State Relative Permeability Data for Capillary End Effects

Abstract

Summary In laboratory measurements of relative permeability, capillary discontinuities at sample ends give rise to capillary end effects (CEEs). End effects affect fluid flow and retention. If end-effect artifacts are not minimized by test design and data interpretation, relative permeability results may be significantly erroneous. This is a well-known issue in unsteady-state tests, but even steady-state relative permeability results are influenced by end-effect artifacts. This work describes the intercept method, a novel modified steady-state approach in which corrections for end-effect artifacts are applied as data are measured. The intercept method requires running a steady-state relative permeability test with several different flow rates for each fractional flow. Obtaining multiple (three or four) sets of rates (Q), pressure drops (ΔP), and saturation data allows for assessment of CEE artifacts. With Darcy flow, a plot of pressure drop vs. total flow rate is typically linear. A nonzero intercept or offset is an end-effect artifact. To correct for the effect, the offset is subtracted from measured pressure drops. Corrected pressure drops are used in permeability calculations. The set of saturations from measurements at the target fractional flow is used to calculate a corrected final saturation. Because corrections for end effects are made during the test rather than after the test is complete, any discrepancies can be resolved by additional measurements before moving on to the next fractional flow. Rates are then adjusted to yield the next target fractional-flow condition, and the same protocol is repeated for each subsequent steady-state measurement. The method is validated by theory and is easy to apply.

Microporous Graphite Composites of Tailorable Porosity, Surface Wettability, and Water Permeability for Fuel Cell Bipolar Plates

“…A steady-state measurement of Q for a given Δ P / t would yield the permeability of the measurement. However, to account for capillary end effects and the pressure gauge’s zero offset, steady-state measurements were conducted at several pressure gradients. The Q versus Δ P / t data for the graphite plates of the present study were found to be linear and were corrected for a non-zero intercept by using a constant additive correction for Δ P (of ≅9 psi for all the specimens), which does not affect the slope of the curve (and therefore the permeability).…”

Assessing the Feasibility of Improving the Performance of CO2 and CO2–WAG Injection Scenarios by CWI

“…At the end piece of the core, capillary pressure vanishes which yields to the accumulation of the wetting phase at the sample end . This phenomenon is called capillary end effect.…”

Methods for Petrological and Petrophysical Characterization of Gas Shales

“…High capillary pressure in shales can cause a significant liquid hold-up at the outlet of the core, which is known as the capillary end effect (CEE). The CEE is also a dominant factor making relative permeability measurements incorrect and unreliable . Moghaddam and Jamiolahmady proposed a novel method to correct the CEE during steady-state relative permeability measurements for shales .…”