Interception efficiency in two-dimensional flow past confined porous cylinders

Abstract

The flow interception efficiency, which provides a measure of the fraction of streamlines that intercept a porous collector, is an important parameter in applications such as particle capture, filtration, and sedimentation. In this work, flow permeation through a porous circular cylinder located symmetrically between two impermeable parallel plates is investigated numerically under different flow and geometrical conditions. A flow interception efficiency is defined and calculated based on the flow permeation rate for a wide range of system parameters. The dependencies on all physical variables can be captured in three dimensionless numbers: the Reynolds number, the Darcy number (ratio of permeability to the square of cylinder diameter), and the plate separation relative to the cylinder size. The flow interception efficiency is very low in the limit of unbounded cylinders but significantly increases by restricting the flow domain. The fluid permeation rate through the porous cylinder varies nonlinearly with the relative plate/cylinder spacing ratio, especially when the gap between the cylinder and the confining plates is small compared to the cylinder size. In general, the effects of the Reynolds number, the Darcy number, and confinement on the flow interception efficiency are coupled; however, for most practical cases it is possible to factorize these effects. For practical ranges of the Darcy number ( < 10 −4 , which means that the pore size is at least one order of magnitude smaller than the porous cylinder diameter), the interception efficiency varies linearly with , is independent of the Reynolds number at low Reynolds numbers ( < 10), and varies linearly with Reynolds number at higher flow rates. In addition to numerical solutions, theoretical expressions are developed for the flow interception efficiency in two limiting cases of confined and unbounded flow, based on modeling the system as a network of hydrodynamic resistances, which agree well with the numerical results. Furthermore, an expression for

On the rotation of a circular porous particle in 2D simple shear flow with fluid inertia

“…Examples include coal particles in power stations, suspended sediment in coastal waters, and catalyst clusters in fluidized bed reactors. The permeability of the particle can affect the flow pattern as well as particle-fluid interactions to various extents (Chen & Cai 1999;Bhattacharyya, Dhinakaran & Khalili 2006;Shahsavari, Wardle & McKinley 2014). Nonetheless, there have been no investigations about the rotation of porous particles in fluid flow, apart from a very recent theoretical analysis by Masoud, Stone & Shelley (2013) on the rotation of porous ellipsoids in an unbounded simple shear flow.…”

Suite-CFD: An Array of Fluid Solvers Written in MATLAB and Python

“…While flow around solid objects is a popular problem in aerodynamics, flow around porous objects has only recently begun to be investigated within in the past few decades, using either high fidelity numerical simulation or experiments [78][79][80][81][82]. Here, we present an example of flow past a porous cylinder using the LBM.…”

Layer-by-layer functionalized nanotube arrays: A versatile microfluidic platform for biodetection

“…Modeling has suggested that changing the CNT elements' geometry to optimize the flow interception at a given pressure drop and fluid volumetric flow rate enhances polymer and bioparticle interception with the CNT surfaces 67 . The recorded intensity via confocal imaging is likely to be conservative and may underestimate the count because of several factors: (1) Fabrication of the microfluidic devices requires inverted imaging, i.e., through the PDMS because of the opacity of silicon.…”