1998
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/9.4.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercolonial encounters and xenophobia in the common mole rat, Cryptomys hottentotus hottentotus (Bathyergidae): the effects of aridity, sex, and reproductive status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They furthermore suggest that larger groups may form more social sub-units which may in turn counter any densitydependent parasite propagation (Chapman et al 2009). In the common mole-rat the heightened xenophobia in arid populations (Spinks et al 1998) is a social mechanism likely to be responsible for maintaining group integrity and decreasing transmission rates (Freeland 1976;Loehle 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They furthermore suggest that larger groups may form more social sub-units which may in turn counter any densitydependent parasite propagation (Chapman et al 2009). In the common mole-rat the heightened xenophobia in arid populations (Spinks et al 1998) is a social mechanism likely to be responsible for maintaining group integrity and decreasing transmission rates (Freeland 1976;Loehle 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On South Africa's west coast dispersal patterns differ along a latitudinal gradient with increasing annual rainfall from north to south and dispersal being greater in mesic areas (Spinks et al 2000b;Bishop et al 2004). The resulting differences in colony integrity coincides with a markedly increased xenophobia in arid compared to mesic sites (Spinks et al 1998). At the same time, the population densities of common mole-rats at the rainfall extremes differ by an order of magnitude and can reach densities of 18.7 ±1.2 individuals/ha in mesic compared to 1.8 ±0.2 individuals/ha in arid sites while mean colony size (5.1 ±0.2 individuals) is comparable (Spinks et al 2000b;Bishop et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mole rats tend to prune the buds and sprouting shoots from corms and tubers (Bennett & Faulkes, 2000), whereas the Mediterranean blind mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi does the same with Oxalis bulbs but eats the shoots (Galil, 1967). It has also been observed that mole rats ‘farm’ geophytes (Jarvis & Sale, 1971; Bennett, 1988; Spinks, 1998; Bennett & Faulkes, 2000) by partially consuming the geophytes and then replugging the consumed section with soil so that it will regenerate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophytes have a high water content of 77–80% by weight (Bennett & Jarvis, 1995) and the humidity in the burrow systems of the mole rats is high (>95%); therefore water loss is low (Buffenstein & Yahav, 1991). The size of the geophytes is also important and, in arid areas where there is a decrease in geophyte density, there tends to be an increase in the average size of food items (Bennett, 1988; Spinks, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%