1984
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5087(84)91343-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of automatic fission track counting systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automatic track counting is impeded by the relatively small size of the chemically etched tracks in the widely used SSNTDs. Commercially available image analyzer instruments like the Quantimet 720, Leitz-TAS, FAOM, SCION and TRIAC are also used for track counting (2)(3)(4)(5). Other approaches are based on photometry (6) or on the obstructed total internal reflection of light (TIR) (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic track counting is impeded by the relatively small size of the chemically etched tracks in the widely used SSNTDs. Commercially available image analyzer instruments like the Quantimet 720, Leitz-TAS, FAOM, SCION and TRIAC are also used for track counting (2)(3)(4)(5). Other approaches are based on photometry (6) or on the obstructed total internal reflection of light (TIR) (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the efforts of many groups, various automatic and semi-automatic counting techniques have been developed and used for track counting in Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors (SSNTDs) (for example, see [9] and the references therein). Among these are commercially available systems such as Quantimed 720 [10], Densitron 4M [11] and others as well as systems based on coupling of a CCD or a video camera to an optical microscope and counting with appropriate algorithm/software [12]- [19]. Numerical codes for automatic counting, modeling the track development and calculation of track parameters have also been developed (for example, see [20]- [22] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%