1963
DOI: 10.3109/02841866309135065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of National Roentgen and Gamma Ray Exposure-Dose Standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the calibrations agreed with earlier results between three of the four laboratories to within the expected uncertainty of 0.5 percent (Ref. 606).…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Also, the calibrations agreed with earlier results between three of the four laboratories to within the expected uncertainty of 0.5 percent (Ref. 606).…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 88%
“…One set of indirect comparisons using two of the three-terminal cavity chambers (transfer in¬ struments) described in the last ICRU Report (1959) has been completed. The results of these comparisons are given in table IIA4 (Wyckoff et al, 1963). The estimated maximum uncertainty of about 0.5 percent is somewhat larger than that assigned to direct comparisons, though it is con¬ sidered that it should be possible to improve such transfer instruments so that indirect comparisons are almost as accurate as direct ones.…”
Section: (Ig3)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results were corrected by the normal correction procedure (Wyckoff et al 1963). The air path contribution to the total filtration after allowing for the distance of the X-ray tube window from the target (2.5 cm), the thickness of the Be window (3.0 mm) and the thickness of the monitor chamber (4.8 mm perspex) (but not for the thickness of any added filter) was 1.4872 m.…”
Section: Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%