2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of the Gulf Stream in ocean reanalyses: 1993−2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although longer time series of the GS metrics can be derived from numerical hindcast or future projections, it is hard to evaluate the reliability of the GS trends from those products. Chi et al (2018) found that even models constrained by observations could not reproduce most GS metrics well. It is reasonable to assume that hindcasts and climate projections without assimilating satellite SST and sea level anomaly would perform even worse.…”
Section: Detectability Of Trendsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although longer time series of the GS metrics can be derived from numerical hindcast or future projections, it is hard to evaluate the reliability of the GS trends from those products. Chi et al (2018) found that even models constrained by observations could not reproduce most GS metrics well. It is reasonable to assume that hindcasts and climate projections without assimilating satellite SST and sea level anomaly would perform even worse.…”
Section: Detectability Of Trendsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We make use of ocean model simulations to propagate virtual particles. OGCM for the Earth Simulator (OFES; Chi et al, ; Masumoto et al, ; Masumoto, ; Sasaki et al, ) provides a three‐dimensional flow field for the years 2000–2005 from the edge of the Antarctic continent at 75°S to 75°N with 3‐daily output. Since the model has no output north of 75°N, we only show results up to 70°N in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This product has been successfully applied to studies in the Gulf Stream and the reliability was evaluated in Chi et al. (2018). In this work, ARMOR3D is only used to support the discussion section on interpreting the divergent EHF field in the Kuroshio Extension and Gulf Stream to produce Figure 14 in Section 5.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ARMOR3D is a global 3D weekly temperature, salinity, and geostrophic velocities fields at a spatial 0.25° resolution by combining satellite observed sea level anomaly, SST, and salinity data sets with in situ temperature and GUO AND BISHOP 10.1029/2021MS002863 5 of 19 salinity vertical profiles (Guinehut et al, 2012;Mulet et al, 2012;Verbrugge et al, 2017). This product has been successfully applied to studies in the Gulf Stream and the reliability was evaluated in Chi et al (2018). In this work, ARMOR3D is only used to support the discussion section on interpreting the divergent EHF field in the Kuroshio Extension and Gulf Stream to produce Figure 14 in Section 5.…”
Section: Observation-based Armor3d Productmentioning
confidence: 99%