1994
DOI: 10.1029/94jd00740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of tropospheric OH and ancillary trace gas measurements at Fritz Peak Observatory, Colorado

Abstract: The determination of the concentration of OH in the Earth's troposphere is of fundamental importance to an understanding of the chemistry of the lower atmosphere. Although many experiments to measure OH concentration have been performed in recent years, very few operate at sensitivities necesssary to measure the extremely low amount of OH in the clean troposphere (0.1-0.2 parts per trillion by volume at summertime local noon). This paper describes an informal intercomparison campaign held at Fritz Peak, Colora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stevens et al [1997] performed another steady state model and found that HO2 is overestimated by a factor of 3-4 under clean conditions with NO of less than 100 parts per trillion by volume (pptv), suggesting that the slower rates of RO2 + NO reactions and faster rates of RO2 + HO2 reactions for RO2 radicals derived from higher hydrocarbons could reduce the discrepancies. More comprehensive steady state model calculations performed by McKeen et al [1997] have still overpredicted OH concentrations as they did in the 1991 intercomparison studies at a site in the same region [Eisele et al, 1994], even with the larger hydrocarbon data set. When some hydrocarbon compounds which behave similarly to [•-pinene were added to the model in order to decrease the modeled OH to the observed concentrations, total HOx + RO2 was also decreased and the factor of HO2 overprediction was reduced from 4 to 2 Recently, OH and HO2 concentrations observed at Mace Head (53ø20'N, 9ø54'W) during July and August 1996 were compared to model predictions [Carslaw et al, 1999a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stevens et al [1997] performed another steady state model and found that HO2 is overestimated by a factor of 3-4 under clean conditions with NO of less than 100 parts per trillion by volume (pptv), suggesting that the slower rates of RO2 + NO reactions and faster rates of RO2 + HO2 reactions for RO2 radicals derived from higher hydrocarbons could reduce the discrepancies. More comprehensive steady state model calculations performed by McKeen et al [1997] have still overpredicted OH concentrations as they did in the 1991 intercomparison studies at a site in the same region [Eisele et al, 1994], even with the larger hydrocarbon data set. When some hydrocarbon compounds which behave similarly to [•-pinene were added to the model in order to decrease the modeled OH to the observed concentrations, total HOx + RO2 was also decreased and the factor of HO2 overprediction was reduced from 4 to 2 Recently, OH and HO2 concentrations observed at Mace Head (53ø20'N, 9ø54'W) during July and August 1996 were compared to model predictions [Carslaw et al, 1999a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OH concentrations measured in 1991 were much less than expected. A matching interpretation via a photochemical model required the addition of the equivalent of 2 ppb of isoprene (an unrealistically large amount of this compound alone) to the species responsible for OH removal [Eisele et al, 1994]. This signaled a serious deficiency in our understanding of OH loss rates in a Consequently, a major priority of the 1993 campaign was the quantification of OH loss rates through comprehensive measurement of nonmethane hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Nonmethane Hydrocarbons and Formaldehydementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 1991 measurements, model calculations [Eisele et al, 1994] used loss rates due to CO, CH4, and anthropogenic nonmethane hydrocarbons (the latter were not measured but scaled to observed NOx, although their loss rate contribution was minor). Predicted OH was 3 to 5 times measured values, and biogenically emitted hydrocarbon compounds that react with OH were thought the likely reason.…”
Section: Measurement/model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although OH can be measured quite accurately (Perner et al, 1987;Eisele et al, 1994;Hard et al, 1995;Brune et al, 1998;Heard and Pilling, 2003), its variability precludes that the spatially and temporally averaged OH-field, a measure for the atmospheric self-cleansing capacity, is determined from direct observations. An indirect method has therefore been developed, using long-term measurements of the tracer gas methyl chloroform (MCF), a compound which is largely removed from the atmosphere by OH and has only anthropogenic sources (Lovelock, 1977;Singh, 1977;Prinn et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%