2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intercomparison of wind and wave data from the ECMWF Reanalysis Interim and the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
158
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
33
158
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of its relatively coarse resolution, since it is a global product, ERA-Interim is a dataset of superior quality, comparing very well with buoy observations. Additional details about the ERA-Interim reanalysis and its comparison with other global wave hindcasts can be found in [55,58] and [59], respectively.…”
Section: Buoy Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In spite of its relatively coarse resolution, since it is a global product, ERA-Interim is a dataset of superior quality, comparing very well with buoy observations. Additional details about the ERA-Interim reanalysis and its comparison with other global wave hindcasts can be found in [55,58] and [59], respectively.…”
Section: Buoy Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WAM partition scheme is rooted in the Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum [60,61], and based on the wave age parameter, being different from other partition schemes, like the one from [32] used in WW3 and CFSR [59]. The factor 28 corresponds to the peak wave phase speed from the Pierson-Moskowitz spectrum and 1.2 is a tuning parameter.…”
Section: Spectral Partition and Wave Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• and temporal resolution of 6 h. ERAInterim underestimates the extreme wave conditions and has been documented by Stopa and Cheung (2014). Sanil observed that even though the H m0 values more than 3.5 m were underestimated by ERA-Interim data in the AS, Pearson's linear correlation coefficient (r) value for the H m0 was 0.96 with the measured data with bias value of −0.17 m, and the difference between the average value of the H m0 between the measured and ERA-Interim data was less (∼ 0.2 m).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Variability in wave climate to the large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns, referred to as teleconnection patterns (e.g. ENSO) are studied (Hemer et al, 2010;Stopa and Cheung, 2014;Anoop et al, 2016). The variability of wave heights in the North Atlantic are linked to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) (Izaguirre et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%