2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.05.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interconnectedness and interdependencies of critical infrastructures in the US economy: Implications for resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most common resilience analyses deal with descriptive and qualitative analysis. It is then still challenging to define consensual metrics for quantitative resilience analysis (Hollnagel et al 2008;Johnston et al 2008;Hollnagel et al 2011;Stewart & Yuen 2011;Barker et al 2012;Dinh et al 2012;Miller-Hooks et al 2012;Shirali et al 2012;Francis & Bekera 2014;Manyena 2014;Matthews et al 2014;Pant et al 2014;Roege et al 2014;Shafieezadeh & Burden 2014;Aldunce et al 2015;Angeon & Bates 2015;Bond et al 2015;Cardoso et al 2015;Chopra & Khanna 2015;Dijkstra & Viebahn 2015;Kelman et al 2015;Khalili et al 2015;Labaka et al 2015;Lindbom et al 2015;Lundberg & Johansson 2015;Mugume et al 2015;Oken et (Mebarki et al 2014a(Mebarki et al , 2014bMebarki and Barroca 2015). (a) General framework and (b) utility functions and post-disaster recovery.…”
Section: Resilience and Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most common resilience analyses deal with descriptive and qualitative analysis. It is then still challenging to define consensual metrics for quantitative resilience analysis (Hollnagel et al 2008;Johnston et al 2008;Hollnagel et al 2011;Stewart & Yuen 2011;Barker et al 2012;Dinh et al 2012;Miller-Hooks et al 2012;Shirali et al 2012;Francis & Bekera 2014;Manyena 2014;Matthews et al 2014;Pant et al 2014;Roege et al 2014;Shafieezadeh & Burden 2014;Aldunce et al 2015;Angeon & Bates 2015;Bond et al 2015;Cardoso et al 2015;Chopra & Khanna 2015;Dijkstra & Viebahn 2015;Kelman et al 2015;Khalili et al 2015;Labaka et al 2015;Lindbom et al 2015;Lundberg & Johansson 2015;Mugume et al 2015;Oken et (Mebarki et al 2014a(Mebarki et al , 2014bMebarki and Barroca 2015). (a) General framework and (b) utility functions and post-disaster recovery.…”
Section: Resilience and Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is extremely difficult to predict the direct and indirect consequences of a disruption on a complex, large-scale system, quantifying resilience in terms of the recovery time required for a system to return to its equilibrium state is even more difficult. The definition of resilience used in this study is a reworking of ecological resilience for industrial and infrastructure systems [41,42]. Henceforth, resilience in this paper refers to the ability of a system to maintain its structure and function in the face of disruptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cascading effects of some real‐world hazards such as earthquakes, terrorist attacks like economic effects of the 9/11 attack (for example, the considerable disorder in international trade as the result of making international movements harder under more restrictive security concerns), power outages like the 2003 Italy blackout, and so on motivated researchers to study and evaluate the effects of cascading failures in interdependent networked systems . The studies showed that small‐ or large‐scale failures in some critical infrastructure sectors (CISs), including cyberspace, potentially cascade and make catastrophic events . It is evident that the stability of the security and economy of nations are tightly influenced by threats to the cyberspace from different sources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%