Intercropping of Roselle with Red Gram and Nipped Castor is  Beneficial to Dry Land Farmer

Pushpa, T.N.; Umesha, K.; Vasundhara, M.; Ramachandrappa, B. K.; Sreeramu, B. S.; Srikantaprasad, D.

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.268

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This was in agreement with the reports of Lulie et al (2016) and Adafre (2016) who observed increment in total LER as common bean planting density increased from 25% to 100%. Based on the values of total LER, advantage of intercropping roselle with pigeon pea (Pushpa et al, 2017), maize with faba bean (Rezaei-Chianeh et al, 2011) and cotton with cow pea (Aesim et al, 2008) has been reported. 17 NS=not significant; *, **, and *** significant at P≤0.05, P≤0.01 and P≤0.001 probability levels respectively; Rep= Replication; DF = degree of freedom; LER=Land equivalent ratio; MAI=Monetary advantage index.…”

Section: Total Land Equivalent Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Advantage of Intercropping Roselle with Common Bean over Sole Cropping in Ethiopia

Banjaw¹

2019

JESD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This experiment was conducted in Ethiopia, during 2017/2018 dry season to determine the roselle-common bean advantage over sole cropping through competition indices. The experiment was carried out in a RCBD with a 2x4 factorial arrangement of two roselle varieties with four planting densities of common bean plus three sole cropping. It was replicated three times having 11 treatments (sole cropping of two roselle varieties (Hibiscus-Sudan and Hibiscus-Jamaica) and a common bean variety (Ibbado) and intercropping of the two roselle varieties with four common bean planting densities combinations (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%)). Data analysis was done using SAS software version 9.3 and the differences between means were assessed using Duncan`s Multiple Range Test at 5% probability level. Partial land equivalent ratio (LER) analysis showed that there was no significant difference between two roselle varieties while partial LER of common was significantly higher when intercropped with Hibiscus-Sudan (0.51) than with Hibiscus-Jamaica (0.38). Both roselle varieties and common bean planting density did not influence total LER and monetary advantage index (MAI). However, intercropping Hibiscus-Sudan variety resulted higher yield advantage (35%) and monetary advantage (17,946 ETB) and combination of common bean with roselle at 100% planting density resulted 39% yield advantage and 21,410 ETB. Therefore, we recommend combination of Hibiscus-Sudan and 100% planting density of common bean for growers in the same agroecology with the study area for better yield and economic advantage.

show abstract

Section: Total Land Equivalent Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Advantage of Intercropping Roselle with Common Bean over Sole Cropping in Ethiopia

Banjaw¹

2019

JESD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Total Land Equivalent Ratiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Advantage of Intercropping Roselle with Common Bean over Sole Cropping in Ethiopia

2019

JNSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This experiment was conducted in Ethiopia, during 2017/2018 dry season to determine the of roselle-common bean advantage over sole cropping through competition indices. The experiment was carried out in a RCBD with a 2x4 factorial arrangement and replicated three times having 11 treatments (sole cropping of two roselle varieties (Hibiscus-Sudan and Hibiscus-Jamaica) and a common bean variety (Ibbado) and intercropping of the roselle varieties with four common bean planting densities combinations (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%)). Data analysis was done using SAS software version 9.3 and the differences between means were assessed using Duncan`s Multiple Range Test at 5% probability level. Partial land equivalent ratio (LER) analysis showed that there was no significant difference between two roselle varieties while partial LER of common was significantly higher when intercropped with Hibiscus-Sudan (0.51) than with Hibiscus-Jamaica (0.38). Both roselle varieties and common bean planting density did not influence total LER and monetary advantage index (MAI). However, intercropping Hibiscus-Sudan variety resulted higher yield advantage (35%) and monetary advantage (17,946 ETB) and combination of common bean with roselle at 100% planting density resulted 39% yield advantage and 21,410 ETB. Therefore, we recommend combination of Hibiscus-Sudan and 100% planting density of common bean for growers in the same agroecology with the study area for better yield and economic advantage.

show abstract

Growth and Yield Performances of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) to Intercropping Practices: A Review

2020

ALST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intercropping of Roselle with Red Gram and Nipped Castor is Beneficial to Dry Land Farmer

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Advantage of Intercropping Roselle with Common Bean over Sole Cropping in Ethiopia

Advantage of Intercropping Roselle with Common Bean over Sole Cropping in Ethiopia

Advantage of Intercropping Roselle with Common Bean over Sole Cropping in Ethiopia

Growth and Yield Performances of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) to Intercropping Practices: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About