2017
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1321329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interculturality and identity in computer-mediated communication: findings from L2 teaching contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking this notion as their basis, most models of ICC elaborate on the different aspects of (self) awareness and internal transformation required in the process of becoming successful intercultural communicators (see Dooly, 2016 for an overview of definitions related to IC in telecollaboration; based on Spitzberg and Changnon's (2009) synthesis of '300-plus terms and concepts'; see also Vinagre & Corral, 2019). In relation to this, we have pinpointed this as a gap in VE: the frequent oversimplification of what is entailed in the notion of intercultural awareness and intercultural competence (Train, 2006;Kramsch, 2014;Dooly, 2016;Alonso & Vinagre, 2017;Godwin-Jones, 2019;Golubeva & Guntersdorfer, 2020).…”
Section: Research Findings That Have Been Mis-or Over Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking this notion as their basis, most models of ICC elaborate on the different aspects of (self) awareness and internal transformation required in the process of becoming successful intercultural communicators (see Dooly, 2016 for an overview of definitions related to IC in telecollaboration; based on Spitzberg and Changnon's (2009) synthesis of '300-plus terms and concepts'; see also Vinagre & Corral, 2019). In relation to this, we have pinpointed this as a gap in VE: the frequent oversimplification of what is entailed in the notion of intercultural awareness and intercultural competence (Train, 2006;Kramsch, 2014;Dooly, 2016;Alonso & Vinagre, 2017;Godwin-Jones, 2019;Golubeva & Guntersdorfer, 2020).…”
Section: Research Findings That Have Been Mis-or Over Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Taskıran (2019) elucidates the positive effects of telecollaboration activity for learners saying that it increases the learners' awareness of language abilities, encourages them to be involved in language exchanges, and helps them gain confidence in their language skills. Telecollaboration projects are particularly essential as a requirement of the globalised world, in which there are necessities for developing cultural awareness and being able to act appropriately in cultural environments (Alonso-Belmonte & Vinagre, 2017). This is mostly because learners are able to gain a genuine experience of intercultural communication thanks to telecollaboration projects (Marczak, 2013).…”
Section: The Benefits Of Telecollaboration For Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described process is also called virtual exchange, COIL (collaborative online international learning), OIE (online intercultural exchange), e-Tandem, e-Twinning and e-Pals. Based on several studies and projects across the globe, and specifically in Europe (e.g., INTENT, UNICOLLABORATION, TILA), the integration of telecollaboration into classrooms and lecture halls has become valuable for language learners in particular (Cunningham, 2017;Kern, Ware, & Warschauer, 2017;Alonso-Belmonte & Vinagre, 2017).…”
Section: Telecollaboration: Affordances and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%