Interdependent Barriers to Providing Adolescents with Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Qualitative Insights from Providers

Abstract

Study Objective Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods are the most effective form of reversible contraception but are underutilized by adolescents. The purpose of this study is to identify the context-specific barriers to providing adolescents with LARC that are experienced by pediatricians, family medicine physicians, and advanced practice nurses (APNs). Design/Settings/Participants Pediatricians, family medicine providers and APN's (n=16) who care for adolescents participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interview data were analyzed through a modified grounded theory approach. Main Outcome Measures Pediatricians, family medicine physicians and APNs' self-reported attitudes and practices regarding LARC provision to adolescents. Results Provider confidence in LARC, patient-centered counseling on LARC and instrumental supports for LARC all work interdependently either in support of or in opposition to provision of LARC to adolescents. Low provider confidence in LARC for adolescents was characterized by confusion about LARC eligibility criteria and perceptions of LARC insertion as traumatic for adolescents. Patient-centered counseling on LARC required providers' ability to elicit patient priorities, highlight the advantages of LARC over other methods and address patients' concerns about these methods. Instrumental supports for LARC included provider training on LARC, access to and financial support for LARC devices and opportunity to practice LARC insertion and counseling skills. Conclusions While none of the identified essential components of LARC provision to adolescents exist in isolation, instrumental supports like provider training on LARC and access to LARC devices have the most fundamental impact on the other components and on providers' attitudes and practices regarding LARC for adolescents.

Are men ready to use thermal male contraception? Acceptability in two French populations: New fathers and new providers

“…Although HMC acceptability has been evaluated in several studies [ 11 , 29 , 30 ], the acceptability of TMC has never been studied. Moreover, the influence of medical information on the choice of male contraception among physicians for their own use and their patients is poorly understood compared to other populations, such as female teenagers on long-lasting active contraception [ 31 , 32 ].…”

Differences in Contraceptive Discontinuation Among Black and White Women: Evidence from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project

“…Key barriers to LARC use have been identified as cost, provider related (continuing education on method safety and eligibility, device-specific training, work setting), and resource related (availability of contraceptive counseling and devices) 39,40 ; while barriers for non-LARC methods include insurance coverage, cost, difficulty obtaining or refilling prescriptions, challenges getting an appointment or getting to a clinic, and required physical examination. 41 CHOICE strove to minimize barriers to contraceptive continuation through a number of mechanisms: no-cost contraception, support for prescription refills that include collaboration with a regional pharmacy chain and reimbursement of out-of-pocket costs, access to the study clinic for ongoing care, support, and when needed, device removals, and the option to switch methods.…”

La consejería en anticoncepción y los proveedores de salud

“…7 Varios reportes exponen que es factible llegar a identificar actitudes poco incluyentes hacia los usuarios cuando existe una influencia de estatus social, etnia, idioma, género o religión, 7 condición sociopolítica, económica, cultural, 14 entre otras estructurales e interpersonales 15 en el proveedor de salud que va en detrimento de la correcta toma de decisiones y de igualdad en la atención, 7 ya que el recurso humano en mención puede proyectar una imagen de autoridad y miedo. 15 Es significativo resaltar que los proveedores señalan sus debilidades y piden espacios de capacitación en la temática, e incluso apoyo institucional 16 y más aún cuando manifiestan lo valioso de reconocer el rol que merecen los individuos que hacen uso de este tipo de servicios. 17 El estudio de Kelly et al, 12 relata que algunos profesionales de la salud han tenido que modificar su lenguaje técnico científico para llevarlo a un lenguaje más acorde con el implementado por los pacientes.…”