Ititerdisciplitiary programs in schools of social work are growing in scope and number. This article reports on collaboration between a school of social work and a school of engineering, which is forging a new area of interdisciplinary education. The program engages social work students working alongside engineering students in a team approach to developing and implementing international community development projects. The author chronicles the prevalence and types of interdisciplinary, academic social work collaborations over the past 2 decades and oudines the uniqueness of an engineering and social work partnership. After presenting the components of the collaboration, the author analyzes the collaboration's fit for social work education using a model of interdisciplinary social work. Implications for social work education and research are discussed.Interdisciplinary social work education is growing in scope and spanning multiple disciplines. In the late 1990s Berg-Weger and Schneider (1998) profiled social work's academic collaboration, which they deñned generally as "a relationship between the faculty of a social work program and faculty representing other disciplines" (p. 97). Such collaboration could consist of either formal (i.e., written agreements or contracts) or informal arrangements between the social work program and the collaborating disciphne, including but not limited to field placements, research grants, pilot projects, team-teaching efforts, combined courses, or joint degree programs. After surveying accredited graduate and undergraduate social work programs to assess collaborations in research, education, and clinical or community service, Berg-Weger and Schneider found 226 programs across 169 academic units engaged in interdisciplinary work with 16 different disciphnes. The discipline comprising the highest number of collaborative programs was sociology/social sciences (17%), followed by psychology/psychiatry (15%), education (10%), and anthropology (7%). Less represented disciplines (only 2%^% prevalent) included criminology/criminal justice, law, public policy/administration, political science, and human development. Disciplines least represented were economics, history, public health, nursing, geriatrics/gerontology, health care administration, and communications. A few disciplines were represented once: allied health, business, computer science, family science, geography.