1998
DOI: 10.1080/1356215980030105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdisciplinary In‐service at the University: a participatory case‐based model for professional development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case analysis activities moved learners from an individual analysis, to small group discussion in project teams and then to whole class discussion facilitated by the instructor (see Appendix A for details). The purpose of this process was to encourage learners to develop their own interpretations of the cases (Flynn and Klein 2001;Hazard 1992), develop an understanding of the specifics of the situation by working within the confines of the case (Christensen 1987;Miller and Kantrov 1998), develop further understanding of the issues by participating in case discussions which would elicit alternate views (Carlson et al 1998;Levin 1994), and move beyond the context of the specific case by making connections with relevant concepts from the literature and with their own situations and experiences (Miller and Kantrov 1998).…”
Section: The Case Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case analysis activities moved learners from an individual analysis, to small group discussion in project teams and then to whole class discussion facilitated by the instructor (see Appendix A for details). The purpose of this process was to encourage learners to develop their own interpretations of the cases (Flynn and Klein 2001;Hazard 1992), develop an understanding of the specifics of the situation by working within the confines of the case (Christensen 1987;Miller and Kantrov 1998), develop further understanding of the issues by participating in case discussions which would elicit alternate views (Carlson et al 1998;Levin 1994), and move beyond the context of the specific case by making connections with relevant concepts from the literature and with their own situations and experiences (Miller and Kantrov 1998).…”
Section: The Case Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of discussion This study also sought to understand the role of small group and whole class discussions in effective learning from cases, often considered critical because they allow learners to share ideas and confront alternative perspectives in ways that encourage them to clarify their own thinking (Carlson et al 1998;Levin 1994).…”
Section: Students' Individual Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%