2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2018.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdisciplinary scholarly collaboration in data-intensive, public-funded, international digital humanities project work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, they enable the training of students and the production of data for public and scholarly reuse. By contrast, challenges of such data‐intensive work include welcoming productive failure; effecting translation work and finding intermediaries to do it; dividing and delegating labor; resolving conflict; working with technology; settling upon outputs; and dealing with time management, sustainability, and infrastructure (Poole & Garwood, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, they enable the training of students and the production of data for public and scholarly reuse. By contrast, challenges of such data‐intensive work include welcoming productive failure; effecting translation work and finding intermediaries to do it; dividing and delegating labor; resolving conflict; working with technology; settling upon outputs; and dealing with time management, sustainability, and infrastructure (Poole & Garwood, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is the fifth of five on DID3. First, Poole and Garwood () analyze the intellectual, scholarly, and professional benefits and challenges of the initiative. Second, Poole and Garwood () explore the official and unofficial roles and responsibilities of librarians and archivists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of digital humanities (DH) is relatively new and has been undergoing constant reevaluation and redefining since its conception out of the growing intersection between humanities research and the computer sciences (Mahony, 2018). Activities and research topics within the field are highly varied and include digitizing historical documents, studying media and art, evaluating infrastructure, mining data, and developing best teaching practices (Poole, 2017; Poole and Garwood, 2018b). Naturally, this brings a multitude of different experts and academics to the field, such as librarians, archivists, artists, educators and activists (Poole, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2 Collaborative and interdisciplinary nature of digital humanities DH has been a diverse and inclusive field for collaborations and shared knowledge from a wide range of disciplines and researchers such as humanists, sociologists, anthropologists, scientists, computer experts, mathematicians, technologists, artists, designers and communicators, with a convergence on shared methods and values (Rodriguez Ortega, 2018;Bradley et al, 2018). DH has developed and embedded a strong sense of community for collaboratively and collectively cultivating, managing and exchanging expertise and knowledge (Poole and Garwood, 2018a;Richardson and Eichmann-Kalwara, 2017). According to Porter et al (2007), interdisciplinarity involves the integrating of theories, concepts, techniques and data from multiple bodies of specialization or research practices.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Digital Humanities Research and Development Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%