2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdomain Stabilization Impairs CD4 Binding and Improves Immunogenicity of the HIV-1 Envelope Trimer

Abstract: The HIV-1 envelope (Env) spike is a trimer of gp120/gp41 heterodimers that mediates viral entry. Binding to CD4 on the host cell membrane is the first essential step for infection but disrupts the native antigenic state of Env, posing a key obstacle to vaccine development. We locked the HIV-1 Env trimer in a pre-fusion configuration, resulting in impaired CD4 binding and enhanced binding to broadly neutralizing antibodies. This design was achieved via structure-guided introduction of neo-disulfide bonds bridgi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations open the door to an 'epitope maskingbased design' strategy in which strain-specific or nonneutralizing epitopes are artificially covered to redirect the responses to other, potentially cross-neutralizing, epitopes [105,106]. Several studies have successfully used stabilizing mutations (reviewed in [84]), interdomain-locking mutations [107] and glycan shielding to decrease the immunogenicity of unwanted non-neutralizing epitopes without compromising the desired Ab responses [73, [106][107][108][109]. B cell immunology suggests that decreasing the immunogenicity of undesired epitopes should increase the competitive advantage of desired lower affinity bNAb epitopes [110].…”
Section: Epitope Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations open the door to an 'epitope maskingbased design' strategy in which strain-specific or nonneutralizing epitopes are artificially covered to redirect the responses to other, potentially cross-neutralizing, epitopes [105,106]. Several studies have successfully used stabilizing mutations (reviewed in [84]), interdomain-locking mutations [107] and glycan shielding to decrease the immunogenicity of unwanted non-neutralizing epitopes without compromising the desired Ab responses [73, [106][107][108][109]. B cell immunology suggests that decreasing the immunogenicity of undesired epitopes should increase the competitive advantage of desired lower affinity bNAb epitopes [110].…”
Section: Epitope Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,13,17 Comparison of the F14 and Vt8 designs with previous stabilization strategies via the vector-based analysis (Figure 5D and E) revealed that most stabilized SOSIP structures, with the exception of those bound to fusion peptide-directed antibodies and the RC1 structures, resided in two dominant closed state clusters (Figure 5E; Supplementary Table 5). Interestingly, unlike previous stabilization strategies that either reduce or prevent CD4 binding 12,13,17,44 , the F14/Vt8 trimer retained interaction with CD4 while still preventing CD4-induced exposure of open state epitopes. Together, the findings presented here indicated close coupling of sCD4 induced internal rearrangements in gp120 and the N-terminal portion of the gp41 three-helix bundle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Centroids for the vectors in the analysis included a K46-K490 Cα centroid, W571 and W596 c-αs, c-αs of gp120 excluding variable loops the V1/V1 region residues, and the N- and C-termni, and a V1/V2+V3 c-α centroid Vectors between these reference positions were generated and included a projection of the W596 to K46-K490 centroid vector on to the W596 to W571 vector. Angles, distances, and dihedrals between these vectors were then compiled for a set of available crystal and cryo-EM structures with PDB IDs 4TVP 71 , 4ZMJ 25 , 5ACO 72 , 5CEZ 37 , 5CJX 73 , 5D9Q 74 , 5FYJ 75 , 5FYK 75 , 5FYL 75 , 5T3X 76 , 5T3Z 76 , 5U7M 33 , 5U7O 33 , 5UTF 13 , 5V7J 77 , 5V8L 78 , 5V8M 78 , 6CDE 38 , 6CDI 38 , 6CH7 79 , 6CH8 79 , 6CUE 80 , 6CUF 81 , and 6DE7 12 , 5THR 26 , 5VN3 27 , 5VN8 73 , 6CM3 31 , 6EDU 31 , 5FUU 82 , 6DCQ 46 , 6MAR 83 , 5U1F 55 , 5C7K 84 , 5I8H 85 , 5UM8 86 , 5UTY 13 , 5VIY 87 , 5VJ6 87 , 5WDU 14 , 6B0N 88 , 6CCB 89 , 6CE0 11 , 6CH9 79 , 6CHB 79 , 6CK9 90 , 6DCQ 46 , 6DID 91 , 6E5P 92 , 6IEQ 93 , 6MCO 94 , 6MDT 94 , 6MN7 95 , 6MPG 96 , 6MPH 96 , 6MTJ 97 , 6MTN 97 , 6MU6 97 , 6MU7 97 , 6MU8 97 , 6MUF 97 , 6MUG 97 , 6N1V 96 , 6N1W 96 , 6NC2 98 , 6NC3 98 , 6NF2 96 , 6NIJ 47 , 6NM6 99 , 6NNF 99 , 6NNJ 99 , 6OHY 100 , 6OKP 101 , 6OLP 47 , 6ORN 39 , 6ORO 39 , 6OR...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the structural studies discussed above, both the SOS and DS changes are being used in soluble Env trimers for immunization studies (51,54,55,(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71). However, it has been reported that changes in hydrophobic gp41 residues near the viral membrane can disrupt a state 1 HIV-1 Env conformation (13,(72)(73)(74)(75)(76)(77), raising the possibility that membrane interactions can influence the conformation of the HIV-1 Env ectodomain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%