2017
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2017.1316185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interest groups and strategic constructivism: business actors and border security policies in the European Union

Abstract: Evidence suggests that business lobbying shapes European Union (EU) border security policies, but there has been no detailed empirical and theoretical work detailing how interest groups exert influence in this domain. Building on strategic constructivist accounts of policy-making, the article argues that EU border security policies have been tailored to the preferences, identities, and frames of business actors through three key processes. Policy preferences are co-constituted by business actors through strate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maritime border control has exploited ‘remote control’ instruments such as offshore interdiction or detention (Zaiotti 2016 ), ‘smart’ border devices operating pre-emptively (Vaughan-Williams 2015 ) and the use of military technologies for border enforcement (Bialasiewicz 2012 ). In a short time, ‘a market has grown in Europe, driven by a number of firms which engage in the design, production, and supply of border security and surveillance technologies’ (Baird 2018 , 119).…”
Section: Theoretical Debates On Human Security At the Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maritime border control has exploited ‘remote control’ instruments such as offshore interdiction or detention (Zaiotti 2016 ), ‘smart’ border devices operating pre-emptively (Vaughan-Williams 2015 ) and the use of military technologies for border enforcement (Bialasiewicz 2012 ). In a short time, ‘a market has grown in Europe, driven by a number of firms which engage in the design, production, and supply of border security and surveillance technologies’ (Baird 2018 , 119).…”
Section: Theoretical Debates On Human Security At the Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field has seen the emergence of numerous projects and has undergone a rapid evolution (Blumenstock, 2012; Boas, 2017; ITU‐D, 2019; Martin & Singh, 2018; Taylor, 2015). This is hardly surprising, when considering that ramified technological assemblages have reshaped how borders are imagined, visualized, and enforced (Baird, 2017; Squire, 2014; Tazzioli, 2018), and ICTs have been advocated also to support migrants and refugees (e.g., Maitland, 2018).…”
Section: Seeds Of Digitalized Landd?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The security industry creates the conditions for border controls to evolve and be carried out with the support of the most updated and effective technologies (Gammeltoft-Hansen and Nyberg-Sørensen 2012; Sontowski 2016). The border security industry does not only respond to the demand from policymakers by offering solutions for specific problems: its offer may also contribute to shaping the demand (Baird 2018), and thus to design border control policies. It thus plays an indirect role in the deadly effects of the latter.…”
Section: The Border Security Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%