2018
DOI: 10.5089/9781484350980.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interest-Growth Differentials and Debt Limits in Advanced Economies

Abstract: Do persistently low nominal interest rates mean that governments can safely borrow more? To addresses this question, I extend the model of Ghosh et al. [2013] to allow for persistent stochastic changes in nominal interest and growth rates. The key model parameter is the long-run difference between nominal interest and growth rates; if negative, maximum sustainable debts (debt limits) are unbounded. I show how both VAR-and spectral-based methods produce negative point estimates of this long-run differential, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, LICs-the group for which debt stocks usually refers to the narrower perimeter of government-typically report the interest bill for the same level of government so this is less of a problem. Consistent with other studies (see, Mauro et al 2015;Barrett 2018;Escolano, Shabunina, and Woo 2017), our data suggests that, on average, the interest-growth differential has been close to zero or negative since the 1980s across all income groups (Figure 7). However, there is a wide dispersion within each group and positive interestgrowth differentials are not an anomaly.…”
Section: B Predictorssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, LICs-the group for which debt stocks usually refers to the narrower perimeter of government-typically report the interest bill for the same level of government so this is less of a problem. Consistent with other studies (see, Mauro et al 2015;Barrett 2018;Escolano, Shabunina, and Woo 2017), our data suggests that, on average, the interest-growth differential has been close to zero or negative since the 1980s across all income groups (Figure 7). However, there is a wide dispersion within each group and positive interestgrowth differentials are not an anomaly.…”
Section: B Predictorssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Real interest rates are however often computed using CPI inflation rather than the GDP deflator 6. Using Shiller's numbers for interest rates and historical BEA series for GDP, over the longer period 1871 to 2018, the 1-year rate has averaged 4.6%, the 10-year rate 4.6% and nominal GDP growth 5.3% 7. A more detailed construction of the maturity of the debt held by both private domestic and foreign investors is given in Hilscher et al (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our assessment of fiscal sustainability rests on the assumption of positive future interest-growth differentials. While this assumption is in line with assumptions made by other policy institutions, including the US authorities, it is worth pointing out that, when interest rates remain below GDP growth rates in the long run, concerns about a sovereign's solvency are no longer warranted -a point made in Barrett (2018) and Blanchard (2019). However, given the uncertainty surrounding the future path of interest and growth rates and given the immense potential cost of underestimating future interest rates, we take a cautious approach to the issue.…”
Section: Figuresmentioning
confidence: 53%