1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03631.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interest Rate Uncertainty and the Financial Intermediary's Choice of Exposure

Abstract: The financial intermediary's choice of operating as a broker with minimal risk exposure or as an asset‐transformer with interest rate risk is modeled as a funds inventory decision made prior to the resolution of uncertainty regarding the borrowing or lending interest rates. It is shown that an increase in the interest rate uncertainty leads the intermediary to reduce its exposure, thereby offering decreased asset‐transformation and more brokerage services. However, a stochastic increase in the interest rates l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low interest rates, financial liberalization and increased competition from nonbank financial institutions have siphoned lending away from banks, toward alternative savings and investment products. Interest rate uncertainty may also encourage banks to reduce lending, and increase their involvement in providing fee-based services (Deshmukh et al, 1983;Smith, 1993;Heinecke and Shen, 1995). Brewer et al (1996) suggest that non-traditional instruments such as derivatives give financial institutions a chance to hedge their exposure to interest rate risk, complementing their lending activity.…”
Section: Disintermediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low interest rates, financial liberalization and increased competition from nonbank financial institutions have siphoned lending away from banks, toward alternative savings and investment products. Interest rate uncertainty may also encourage banks to reduce lending, and increase their involvement in providing fee-based services (Deshmukh et al, 1983;Smith, 1993;Heinecke and Shen, 1995). Brewer et al (1996) suggest that non-traditional instruments such as derivatives give financial institutions a chance to hedge their exposure to interest rate risk, complementing their lending activity.…”
Section: Disintermediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flannery and James (1984) provide evidence that the interest sensitivity of bank stock returns is related to the maturity composition of banks' assets and liabilities. Deshmukh, Greenbaum, and Kanatas (1983) discuss the impact of variable-rate liabilities and fixed-rate assets on interest rate risk and develop a model for balance sheet duration matching. Mitchell (1989) suggests that banks can manage interest rate risk by reducing the degree of maturity intermediation, essentially matching the interest rate sensitivity of their assets and liabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niehans assumes the marginal "penalty" cost is equal to the cost of borrowing funds to meet the bank's expected liquidity deficit (e.g., the penalty cost could be viewed as the interest rate on funds borrowed in the federal funds market). Deshmukh, Greenbaum, and Kanatas (1983) extend Niehans' concept to examine when the FI will prefer to engage in asset transformation or brokerage activities. They find that increased riskiness in r l and r d will decrease the FI's desire to engage in asset transformation and increase its propensity to act as a broker (even though banks are assumed to be risk-neutral expected profit maximizers).…”
Section: A) Fixed Coefficients Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%