Following an application from Specialised Nutrition Europe (formerly IDACE), submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924No /2006 via the Competent Authority of France, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to beta-palmitate and contribution to softening of stools. The food constituent, beta-palmitate, that is the subject of the health claim, is sufficiently characterised. Contribution to softening of stools is a beneficial physiological effect for infants. In weighing the evidence the Panel took into account that, out of two human intervention studies with important methodological limitations, one suggested a stool-softening effect of beta-palmitate whereas the second did not, that one animal study did not support a stool-softening effect of beta-palmitate, and that the evidence provided for a mechanism by which beta-palmitate could contribute to the softening of stools is weak. The Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of beta-palmitate and softening of stools. was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to beta-palmitate and contribution to softening of stools.
© EuropeanThe scope of the application was proposed to fall under a health claim referring to children's development and health.The food constituent that is the subject of the health claim is beta-palmitate, a structured triglyceride with ≥ 50 % of palmitic acid at the sn-2 (middle or beta) position of the glycerol backbone. The intended use of beta-palmitate is to partially replace conventional triglycerides from vegetable oils in infant formulae to the extent that at least 35 % of the total palmitic acid content, which is assumed to be 20-25 % of total fatty acids, is in the sn-2 position. The Panel considers that beta-palmitate is sufficiently characterised.The claimed effect proposed by the applicant is "contributes to soften the stools, which helps to increase their frequency". The target population proposed by the applicant is infants (from birth to 12 months of age). Upon a request by EFSA for clarification on the claimed effect, the applicant indicated that the claimed effect referred to stool consistency rather than to stool frequency. Contribution to softening of stools is a beneficial physiological effect for infants.Eighteen publications were identified by the applicant and one by the Panel as being pertinent to the claim. Of these, three human studies and four non-human studies did not report on stool outcomes, and three human studies did not provide information about the effect of beta-palmitate on stool consistency. The Panel considers that no conclusions could be drawn from these publications for the scientific substantiation of the claim.Three human studies reported on the effects of beta-palmitate on stool consistency. In one study, stool consistency...