2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intérêts dosimétriques et cliniques de la radiothérapie asservie à la respiration des cancers du poumon et du sein : résultats du Stic 2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many techniques have been proposed for DIBH radiation of left‐side breast cancer to minimize cardiac doses, including involuntary breath‐hold with active breathing control, (8) and voluntary breath‐hold using various devices 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 . McIntosh et al (13) reported voluntary deep inhalation breath‐hold using an RPM signal as a surrogate, in which 43%–60% dose reductions of cardiac doses were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques have been proposed for DIBH radiation of left‐side breast cancer to minimize cardiac doses, including involuntary breath‐hold with active breathing control, (8) and voluntary breath‐hold using various devices 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 . McIntosh et al (13) reported voluntary deep inhalation breath‐hold using an RPM signal as a surrogate, in which 43%–60% dose reductions of cardiac doses were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although patients with COPD or COPDAE with stages IIIA-IIIB lung SCC receive de nitive CCRT, radiation oncologists might consider more precision RT techniques, including image-guided radiation therapy, respirator gating, and other respiratory control techniques, for reducing RILI and ensuring low irradiation to normal lung, heart, and esophageal tissues to prevent acute or late radiation-induced pulmonary, cardiac, and esophageal toxicities in these patients. [56,57] This study has some limitations. First, toxicity induced by different treatments could not be determined; therefore, treatment-related mortality estimates may have been biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…High-precision radiotherapy (HPR), i.e., intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), has steadily established its role in cancer treatment. Increasing clinical data have shown the advantage of HPR due to its excellent dose distribution in the target volume and sparing of normal tissues1234. Compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), HPR usually requires more fraction delivery time (FDT) due to the more complicated delivery process (approximately 1 to 3 minutes for conventional EBRT and 15 minutes or more for HPR, i.e., prospective respiratory gating Image-guided IMRT usually takes more than 50 minutes to deliver the same fraction dose).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%