1993
DOI: 10.1557/proc-313-791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface and Volume Anisotropy of MBE-Grown Co/Pt (111), (110) and (001) and Sputtered CO/Pt Multilayers

Abstract: A quantitative determination of interface (Ks) and volume anisotropy (Ko) constants of MBE and sputtered Co/Pt multilayers is reported. Torque and VSM magnetometry were used to determine the total average anisotropy and the room temperature magnetization of four different series of films with varying Co thickness and nearly constant Pt thickness. All films were characterized with X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence, allowing the determination of the "magnetic" volume with good accuracy. Both Ks and KWf ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At some critical thicknesses t Co , the magnetization changes its preferential orientation due to the predominance of shape anisotropy over the magnetocrystalline and interface anisotropies, and vice versa. If the thickness t Co of a single Co layer is below ∼16 Å, 1 the interface anisotropy overcomes the shape anisotropy, resulting in an OOP magnetization independent of the number of repeats N [4,7,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. However, if the Co thickness is larger than ∼16 Å, the shape anisotropy, which is constant and equal to 2πM 2 S in the low thickness regime (where M s is the magnetization at saturation) [41], starts to dominate the interface anisotropy, which scales with the inverse thickness [7], and the magnetization turns IP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At some critical thicknesses t Co , the magnetization changes its preferential orientation due to the predominance of shape anisotropy over the magnetocrystalline and interface anisotropies, and vice versa. If the thickness t Co of a single Co layer is below ∼16 Å, 1 the interface anisotropy overcomes the shape anisotropy, resulting in an OOP magnetization independent of the number of repeats N [4,7,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. However, if the Co thickness is larger than ∼16 Å, the shape anisotropy, which is constant and equal to 2πM 2 S in the low thickness regime (where M s is the magnetization at saturation) [41], starts to dominate the interface anisotropy, which scales with the inverse thickness [7], and the magnetization turns IP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ECR sputter deposition, however, is known to result in highly /111S-textured Pt films with smooth surfaces [7]. That means the increase of interface anisotropy in the combined ECR/magnetron fabricated films compared to the magnetron-sputtered films must be appointed to better crystal orientation of the seed layer as the epitaxial growth of hcp [0 0 0 1] Co is best for Pt(111) [2]. Additionally, smoother interfaces support higher interface anisotropies [16].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the highest perpendicular anisotropy is obtained for epitaxial growth [2][3][4] at best on single crystal surfaces [3,4]. Nowadays, the multilayers are mostly fabricated via magnetron sputtering, a growth technique that is easy to apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumes a maximal, intrinsic interface anisotropy value of K S ≅ 1 erg/cm 2 (100%) (see e.g. results found in highly perfected MBE Co/Pt films [6]). Interestingly, these are exactly the doses needed to trigger spin reorientation in the present samples.…”
Section: ≅13·10mentioning
confidence: 99%