2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface engineering of graphene/copper matrix composites decorated with tungsten carbide for enhanced physico-mechanical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, CuMCs with both high UT and high EC were achieved. In Figure 8 a, the UT and EC values of the SSCu@rGO/Cu composites prepared in this paper are compared with those of other carbon-containing CuMCs [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. It can be seen that most studies could not achieve both high UT and high EC, mainly because of the incompatibility between the strengthening and conductive mechanisms of carbon-based CuMCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, CuMCs with both high UT and high EC were achieved. In Figure 8 a, the UT and EC values of the SSCu@rGO/Cu composites prepared in this paper are compared with those of other carbon-containing CuMCs [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. It can be seen that most studies could not achieve both high UT and high EC, mainly because of the incompatibility between the strengthening and conductive mechanisms of carbon-based CuMCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The YS increment Δ σ G of the composites relative to the matrix caused by the grain refinement is where K = 140 MPa μm 1/2 is the Hall–Petch coefficient of Cu [ 41 ]. As shown in Figure 9 c,d, the grain sizes of Cu and the SSCu@rGO/Cu composites were measured, and the average grain sizes are d M = 8.6 μm and d C = 4.5 μm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of Cu matrix composites using reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and CNTs as the carbon sources have shown that interfacial carbides are preferentially formed at the defective sites of the rGO and CNTs because of the highly reactive nature of carbon atoms in these defects (pristine and produced) regions, as well as easy formation of carbides. [ 25–28 ] Therefore, the defect structures and distribution of carbon sources play critical roles in the nucleation and growth of these carbides. Figure 2g schematically summarizes the mechanisms for interfacial TiC phase formation and the evolution of GNPs during the ball milling process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased strength in graphene or CNTs reinforced MMCs can be attributed to a variety of mechanisms, including grain refinement strengthening, [ 37,38 ] load transfer strengthening, [ 16 ] solution strengthening, [ 27 ] Orowan looping strengthening, in situ TiC strengthening, [ 39–41 ] and thermal expansion mismatch strengthening. [ 18 ] However, not all these strengthening mechanisms are contributed to the increased strength in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, they can retain the high electrical conductivity and high thermal conductivity of the Cu metal material while having good mechanical properties [ 11 , 12 ]. Moreover, graphene/Cu composite has good designability and is expected to be applied in the fields of different structures and functional materials [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%